Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drop high-level python2 tools #6848

Merged

Conversation

davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

try again for #6846 (but with more packages removed)

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14634/summary.html
COMMIT: f177579
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-04-27-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14634/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

External Build

I found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #6848 was updated.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14638/summary.html
COMMIT: 15680af
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-04-27-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14638/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test import-cjson had ERRORS
---> test testBottleneck had ERRORS
---> test testPandas had ERRORS
---> test testRootNumpy had ERRORS
and more ...

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3034 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2877605
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7704
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2869879
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 37 workflows

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33560

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlange6 commented May 3, 2021 via email

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33597

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, thanks! (We have these sorts of errors in the modules IB - thats interesting…)

@davidlange6 , Modules IB issues are real one and I think they might be related to the cms-sw/cmssw#33186 .

I have built module IB using SCRAM V2 (perl base) and workflow 135.1 fails with the same error

2021-05-04 16:18:09.491313: I tensorflow/core/platform/profile_utils/cpu_utils.cc:112] CPU Frequency: 2394450000 Hz
04-May-2021 16:18:16 CEST  Closed file file:step1.root
----- Begin Fatal Exception 04-May-2021 16:18:16 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'DictionaryNotFound' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=PATTriggerProducer label='patTrigger'
Exception Message:
No Dictionary for class: 'edm::AssociationMap<edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<edm::View<reco::Track>,vector<TrackingParticle>,double,unsigned int,edm::RefToBaseProd<reco::Track>,edm::RefProd<vector<TrackingParticle> >,edm::RefToBase<reco::Track>,edm::Ref<vector<TrackingParticle>,TrackingParticle,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<vector<TrackingParticle>,TrackingParticle> > > >'
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidlange6 commented May 4, 2021 via email

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2021

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14820/summary.html
COMMIT: a9b6f27
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14820/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 3 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 37
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2662646
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2662617
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 36 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 155 log files, 37 edm output root files, 37 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test for CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test for slc7_aarch64_gcc9

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test for slc7_ppc64le_gcc9

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14857/summary.html
COMMIT: a9b6f27
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/slc7_ppc64le_gcc9
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14857/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14857/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14857/git-merge-result

Build

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc
>> Compiling  /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc
In file included from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27,
                 from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7,
                 from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1:
/scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb'
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14859/summary.html
COMMIT: a9b6f27
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/slc7_aarch64_gcc9
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14859/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14859/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14859/git-merge-result

Build

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc
>> Compiling  /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc
In file included from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27,
                 from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7,
                 from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1:
/home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb'
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 4, 2021

-1

Failed Tests: Build
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14856/summary.html
COMMIT: a9b6f27
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/6848/14856/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14856/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14856/git-merge-result

Build

I found compilation error when building:

>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc
>> Compiling  /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc
In file included from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27,
                 from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7,
                 from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1:
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb'
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid
   64 |     typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers;
      |                                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @smuzaffar - should we put this in DEVEL for 1100?
(I don't see why any of these changes would give arch specific problems. Its removing things:) )

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

hi @smuzaffar - should we put this in DEVEL for 1100?
(I don't see why any of these changes would give arch specific problems. Its removing things:) )

@davidlange6 , Just wanted to make sure to catch any %ifarch aarch64|ppc64le type statements in spec files.
Sure, we can put it in DEVEL IBs

@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the base branch from IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/master to IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/devel May 5, 2021 07:23
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals
merging it for DVEL IBs.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 5, 2021

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/devel IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit cb4ec6e into cms-sw:IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/devel May 5, 2021
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 , DEVEL IBs looks good. Lokk like it is safe to include it in master IBs

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 6, 2021

backport done
Successfully backported PR #6848 as #6878 for branch IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants