-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
drop high-level python2 tools #6848
drop high-level python2 tools #6848
Conversation
please test |
A new Pull Request was created by @davidlange6 (David Lange) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14634/summary.html External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
Pull request #6848 was updated. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test import-cjson had ERRORS ---> test testBottleneck had ERRORS ---> test testPandas had ERRORS ---> test testRootNumpy had ERRORS and more ... Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33560 |
Ok, thanks!
(We have these sorts of errors in the modules IB - thats interesting…)
… On May 3, 2021, at 7:42 PM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33597
yes @davidlange6 , I think these should be fixed for today's 11h00 IB. I am starting the tests again
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#33597 |
@davidlange6 , Modules IB issues are real one and I think they might be related to the cms-sw/cmssw#33186 . I have built module IB using SCRAM V2 (perl base) and workflow 135.1 fails with the same error
|
Yes, I need to look into this error.. Instead I mean some older ones affecting a few workflows (unit tests mostly) that had the same sort of missing dictionary errors as in these tests (eg, the same missing dictionaries..)
… On May 4, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
Ok, thanks! (We have these sorts of errors in the modules IB - thats interesting…)
@davidlange6 , Modules IB issues are real one and I think they might be related to the cms-sw/cmssw#33186 .
I have built module IB using SCRAM V2 (perl base) and workflow 135.1 fails with the same error
2021-05-04 16:18:09.491313: I tensorflow/core/platform/profile_utils/cpu_utils.cc:112] CPU Frequency: 2394450000 Hz
04-May-2021 16:18:16 CEST Closed file file:step1.root
----- Begin Fatal Exception 04-May-2021 16:18:16 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'DictionaryNotFound' occurred while
[0] Constructing the EventProcessor
[1] Constructing module: class=PATTriggerProducer label='patTrigger'
Exception Message:
No Dictionary for class: 'edm::AssociationMap<edm::OneToManyWithQualityGeneric<edm::View<reco::Track>,vector<TrackingParticle>,double,unsigned int,edm::RefToBaseProd<reco::Track>,edm::RefProd<vector<TrackingParticle> >,edm::RefToBase<reco::Track>,edm::Ref<vector<TrackingParticle>,TrackingParticle,edm::refhelper::FindUsingAdvance<vector<TrackingParticle>,TrackingParticle> > > >'
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-74c3b8/14820/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test for CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X |
please test for slc7_aarch64_gcc9 |
please test for slc7_ppc64le_gcc9 |
-1 Failed Tests: Build The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Compiling /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc >> Compiling /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc In file included from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27, from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7, from /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1: /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb' 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /scratch/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
-1 Failed Tests: Build The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Compiling /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc >> Compiling /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc In file included from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27, from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7, from /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1: /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb' 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/cmsbuild/jenkins_a/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-05-04-1100/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
-1 Failed Tests: Build The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsList.cc >> Compiling /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc In file included from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactory.h:27, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/interface/PhysicsListFactory.h:7, from /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/SimG4Core/Physics/src/PhysicsListFactory.cc:1: /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:58: error: 'zero_allocator' is not a member of 'tbb' 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_12_0_PY3_X_2021-05-03-2300/src/FWCore/PluginManager/interface/PluginFactoryBase.h:64:73: error: template argument 2 is invalid 64 | typedef tbb::concurrent_vector> PMakers; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
hi @smuzaffar - should we put this in DEVEL for 1100? |
@davidlange6 , Just wanted to make sure to catch any |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_0_X/devel IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@davidlange6 , DEVEL IBs looks good. Lokk like it is safe to include it in master IBs |
try again for #6846 (but with more packages removed)