-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DD4hep] Update to latest commit v01-15x #6612
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
Pull request #6612 was updated. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test GeometryDTGeometryBuilderTestDriver had ERRORS RelVals
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test GeometryDTGeometryBuilderTestDriver had ERRORS RelVals
|
#32809 should fix the failure of the 11624.911 workflow. I will submit a PR to remove the failing |
#32823 is fixing more files that are impacted by the DD4hep change in this PR. Several more files will also need to be fixed. |
#32834 disables the failing |
please test with cms-sw/cmssw#32823, cms-sw/cmssw#32834 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ba0ab/12956/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Reco comparisons are apparently significantly different only in the DD4HEP workflow 11634.911. A few spot-checks suggest that this has a different random number sequence either in SIM or later in DIGI; so, many distributions are somewhat different. Based on
This looks pretty bad. A few files that I checked have a lot of
these are not present in the baseline. |
@slava77 I'm very sorry I did a mistake. sorry for the noise this is not tested with the proper root |
no no, it's fine actually. it's the proper ROOT. |
@Dr15Jones Seems that cms-sw/cmssw#32782 turned the |
As I tried to summarize in #6612 (comment) I don't see anything bad for reco, the differences in 11634.911 are apparently happening earlier, in the SIM or perhaps DIGI stage. |
|
please test with #6657, cms-sw/cmssw#32947 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-0ba0ab/12973/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Unit tests and DD4hep workflow results look good. I think this PR can be merged. I will test it some more in parallel. |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
the dd4hep plugin generator is renamed to
listcomponents_dd4hep
now