Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update master-106X to CMSSW_10_6_2 #391

Merged
merged 290 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019
Merged

Update master-106X to CMSSW_10_6_2 #391

merged 290 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019

Conversation

peruzzim
Copy link

No description provided.

cmsbuild and others added 30 commits May 13, 2019 22:41
…-106X

Fix for CondCore/CondDB unit tests
Update the RelMon blacklist file for histos in DT/Run summary/EventInfo/DCSContents with Nans
fixing the lost tracks quality assignment
…ixel detector (for phase1 : bug fix, for phase2 : new feature)
Run3-hcx201 Modify Hcal geometry in view of no HE (backporting PR cms-sw#26749)
fabiocos and others added 15 commits July 16, 2019 23:16
Add scenario Run3 to Configuration/DataProcessing
New plots for Tracking Workspace (Backport to CMSSW_10_6_X of cms-sw#27330)
PPS: update of association cuts (backport of cms-sw#27440)
[Backport] DQMGEMStatusDigi bug fix
Fix energy fractions after jet resolution smearing [106X backport]
…l-ul-ref-106X

Update ECAL conditions to provide correct reference for 2016 and 2018 UL [10_6_X]
Restore updated PPS association cuts for 2017
@gpetruc-bot
Copy link

@gpetruc-bot
Copy link

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

Copy link

@gpetruc-bot gpetruc-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automatic test report for 1052806

Code integration

Code checks passed for this PR

Please update PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/python/nanoDQM_cfi.py: take this patch or run prepareDQM.py -d -u nano_file_mc.root, and then if needed adjust the plot range using some human common sense.

Tests

  • Long test data102X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc102X (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc106X (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc80X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94X (10000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94X2016 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Long test mc94Xv2 (9000 events): passed, no significant changes; dqm plots: all, diff
  • Test mc_94Xv2: passed
  • Test mc_102X: passed
  • Test data_94X: passed
  • Test data_102X: passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.