Fix charge info in 1200,1600,2000 GeV HIP files

[tvami]

I found a typo in the charge determination, HIP3 has not 3 charge and HIP6 has now 6 charge.

Please note these are changes in the comments, so it was not very obvious that those are relevant... After local tests it seems they are!

[tvami]

type bugfix

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for branch master.

@SiewYan, @smuzaffar, @mkirsano, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider, @Saptaparna, @cmsbuild, @alberto-sanchez, @menglu21, @GurpreetSinghChahal can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[Saptaparna]

+1

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e39d6d/32107/summary.html
COMMIT: ea0f17e
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-04-24-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-data/Configuration-Generator/12/32107/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 25 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 12 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3460685
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 9
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3460654
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

hi @perrotta @rappoccio can we merge this in master before the 2300 IB? I'd like to make the backport to 10_6_X so we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting.

[smuzaffar]

+externals

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)