-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review behavior of existing features on multi-range selections in tables #6116
Comments
May be blocked by #6328. |
Features broken so far when executed on a multi-cell selection (they crash):
I checked some of them and it mostly comes down to the If we fixed that, then the |
Other: Introduced support for multi-range selections. Closes ckeditor/ckeditor5#6116.
Other: Introduced support for multi-range selections. See ckeditor/ckeditor5#6116.
Internal: We need to take care of putting the selection in a correct position. See ckeditor/ckeditor5#6116.
📝 Provide a description of the improvement
Most of the CKEditor 5 features are already implemented with multi-range selection in mind or they operate on multiple nodes by default. However, as we introduce a multi-range selection as a supported solution in the model, we must check how features integrate with such a selection.
Add integration tests for the existing features that will validate that existing CKEditor 5 features works with a selected table fragment (multi-range selection).
Requires #6113.
If you'd like to see this improvement implemented, add a 👍 reaction to this post.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: