Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove chisel3.stage.phases.DriverCompatibility #1772

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 5, 2021

Conversation

seldridge
Copy link
Member

Remove the private[chisel3] phases inside the DriverCompatibility object. This then deprecates the (always publicly empty) object.

Contributor Checklist

  • [n/a] Did you add Scaladoc to every public function/method?
  • [n/a] Did you add at least one test demonstrating the PR?
  • Did you delete any extraneous printlns/debugging code?
  • Did you specify the type of improvement?
  • Did you add appropriate documentation in docs/src?
  • Did you state the API impact?
  • Did you specify the code generation impact?
  • Did you request a desired merge strategy?
  • Did you add text to be included in the Release Notes for this change?

Type of Improvement

  • code cleanup

API Impact

Deprecates a public object.

Backend Code Generation Impact

None.

Desired Merge Strategy

  • Squash: The PR will be squashed and merged (choose this if you have no preference.

Release Notes

Reviewer Checklist (only modified by reviewer)

  • Did you add the appropriate labels?
  • Did you mark the proper milestone (3.2.x, 3.3.x, 3.4.0, 3.5.0) ?
  • Did you review?
  • Did you check whether all relevant Contributor checkboxes have been checked?
  • Did you mark as Please Merge?

@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Judging by the deprecation warning, I assume this is 3.4.x? There will be waivers because package private isn't true Java binary compatibility even though we consider it so from Scala.

@seldridge
Copy link
Member Author

3.4.x or 3.5 is fine. If it's the latter, I'll update the deprecation warning number again.

@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Is any of this code used by the stuff @sequencer recently deleted? If so then it has to be 3.5.

@seldridge
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, Driver uses this. This needs #1730. 3.5 it is.

@jackkoenig jackkoenig added this to the 3.5.0 milestone Feb 4, 2021
@sequencer
Copy link
Member

@jackkoenig When should we get this in?
before or after 3.5 released?

@jackkoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Let's get it in before 3.5

@jackkoenig jackkoenig merged commit 365a51a into master May 5, 2021
@jackkoenig jackkoenig deleted the dev/seldridge/rm-DriverCompatibility branch May 5, 2021 17:19
jackkoenig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
Add cross-building of unidoc to test issues if a user later does a
+publishLocal (like with Chisel CI).

Signed-off-by: Schuyler Eldridge <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants