Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Martin Comments #8

Open
jimsch opened this issue Jun 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Martin Comments #8

jimsch opened this issue Jun 30, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jimsch
Copy link
Contributor

jimsch commented Jun 30, 2019

I have few comments:

  • why only mention verified errata? what about "held for document update" type of errata? I also note there are 4 Reported errata. A more general sentence could be: "The CBOR working group will update RFC 7049 based on existing errata."

  • I find "popular" a bit subjective. Is that really needed?

  • s/a Full Internet Standard/an Internet Standard/

Thank you

jimsch added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2019
* Deal with all of Barry's nits in #3
* Deal with first and third of Martin's Comments #8
@jimsch jimsch mentioned this issue Jul 1, 2019
fpalombini added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2019
Deal with 2nd comment from Martin #8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant