Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore/change test method naming to google style guide #757

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

dsmf
Copy link

@dsmf dsmf commented Feb 5, 2024

No description provided.

@dsmf dsmf requested a review from ds-jhartmann February 5, 2024 15:26
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

CHANGELOG file was not updated! Make sure to include important changes.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

@ds-jhartmann ds-jhartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dsmf dsmf merged commit 13812d6 into main Feb 5, 2024
@dsmf dsmf deleted the chore/change-test-method-naming-to-google-style-guide branch February 5, 2024 15:41
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
…usage-policy-validation-flow-correction

fix(policy-validation):[eclipse-tractusx#757] fix
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants