Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(run):[TRI-XXX] Changes to optionally run the app without the run config #214

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ds-mmaul
Copy link

@ds-mmaul ds-mmaul commented Mar 23, 2023

Code provided by @ds-jkreutzfeld , successfully launched the jar with local profile

@ds-mmaul ds-mmaul closed this Mar 23, 2023
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
…stest non-failing result while ignoring the others
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
reason: returning Optional requires too many changes in existing code when ResultFinder is used later
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
…istryService

- EndpointDataForConnectorsService returns multiple EndpointDataReferences now
- These are handled in DecentralDigitalTwinRegistryService.fetchShellDescriptors and by selecting the results of the fastest
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2024
…rAsset in combination with the actual data request
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2024
…plantuml because currently we don't support mermaid there
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
switch log.debug to info because debug does not seem to get logged and add special marker "#214@" to filter the logs for debugging the story
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
This commit corrects the glossary sort order and adds some missing definitions, explanations and links.
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
…ug infos

Moved logging from helper class to business class because this way the log entry shows the business class and not the helper class.
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
The TODOs concerning #405 are resolved by #214.
Also removed the type of exception from the method name because this information is in the assert which is sufficient. No need to duplicate this.
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
dsmf added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
Partial implementation started in context of #214 before story was split up. This commit is just meant to back up the work. It is neither complete nor does it work yet and it still contains compile errors.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant