-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User-Test ytt Schema Validation #707
Comments
While there's some ongoing previews/interviews; we've completed the scope of interviews required to validate/confirm the requisite API claims. 👍🏻 |
Repository owner
moved this from Done
to Closed
in Carvel
Aug 29, 2022
github-actions
bot
added
the
carvel triage
This issue has not yet been triaged for relevance
label
Aug 29, 2022
This was referenced Aug 29, 2022
pivotaljohn
removed
the
carvel triage
This issue has not yet been triaged for relevance
label
Sep 1, 2022
This was referenced Sep 1, 2022
pivotaljohn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 12, 2022
... to improve readability. Usability testing (#707) made clear that violation messages on a single line are quite difficult to visually parse, making such error messages less readable. To support the reformatting, context is gathered at the time a violation is detected. The message is formatted once all violations have been collected. Also includes minor improvements to "named" rule messages to improve readability.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With the core validation rules implemented, let's get usability and suitability feedback from users.
The goal is to vet our assumptions so that we can either confidently adjust or move forward with our implementation towards General Availability of this feature.
📝 ytt Validations Usability Testing Plan (Google Doc)
Plan:
Interview:
Results:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: