Merge pull request rspec#2514 from rspec/fix-ruby2-keywords-in-contro…

…ller-spec-method-missing

Fix keyword arguments in dynamic methods in controller specs

Changelog.md

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Bug Fixes:
 * Fix `ActiveRecord::TestFixture#uses_transaction` by using example description
   to replace example name rather than example in our monkey patched
   `run_in_transaction?` method.  (Stan Lo, #2495)
+* Prevent keyword arguments being lost when methods are invoked dynamically
+  in controller specs. (Josh Cheek, #2509, #2514)
 
 ### 5.0.1 / 2021-03-18
 [Full Changelog](https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/compare/v5.0.0...v5.0.1)

lib/rspec/rails/example/controller_example_group.rb

@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ def method_missing(method, *args, &block)
           super
         end
       end
+      ruby2_keywords :method_missing if respond_to?(:ruby2_keywords, true)
 
       included do
         subject { controller }

spec/rspec/rails/example/controller_example_group_spec.rb

@@ -19,6 +19,23 @@ def group_for(klass)
       expect(group.included_modules).to include(RSpec::Rails::Matchers::RoutingMatchers)
     end
 
+    it "handles methods invoked via `method_missing` that use keywords" do
+      group =
+        RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup.describe ApplicationController do
+          def a_method(value:); value; end
+          def method_missing(_name, *_args, **kwargs, &_block); a_method(**kwargs); end
+
+          # This example requires prepend so that the `method_missing` definition
+          # from `ControllerExampleGroup` bubbles up to our artificial one, in reality
+          # this is likely to be either an internal RSpec dispatch or one from a 3rd
+          # party gem.
+          prepend ControllerExampleGroup
+        end
+      example = group.new
+
+      expect(example.call_a_method(value: :value)).to eq :value
+    end
+
     context "with implicit subject" do
       it "uses the controller as the subject" do
         controller = double('controller')