rspec-rails
brings the RSpec testing framework to Ruby on Rails
as a drop-in alternative to its default testing framework, Minitest.
In RSpec, tests are not just scripts that verify your application code. They’re also specifications (or specs, for short): detailed explanations of how the application is supposed to behave, expressed in plain English.
According to RSpec Rails new versioning strategy use:
rspec-rails
5.x for Rails 6.x.rspec-rails
4.x for Rails from 5.x or 6.x.rspec-rails
3.x for Rails earlier than 5.0.rspec-rails
1.x for Rails 2.x.
IMPORTANT This README / branch refers to the current development build.
See the 5-0-maintenance
branch on Github if you want or require the latest stable release.
-
Add
rspec-rails
to both the:development
and:test
groups of your app’sGemfile
:# Run against this stable release group :development, :test do gem 'rspec-rails', '~> 5.0.0' end # Or, run against the main branch # (requires main-branch versions of all related RSpec libraries) group :development, :test do %w[rspec-core rspec-expectations rspec-mocks rspec-rails rspec-support].each do |lib| gem lib, git: "https://github.com/rspec/#{lib}.git", branch: 'main' end end
(Adding it to the
:development
group is not strictly necessary, but without it, generators and rake tasks must be preceded byRAILS_ENV=test
.) -
Then, in your project directory:
# Download and install $ bundle install # Generate boilerplate configuration files # (check the comments in each generated file for more information) $ rails generate rspec:install create .rspec create spec create spec/spec_helper.rb create spec/rails_helper.rb
If your project is already using an older version of rspec-rails
,
upgrade to the latest version with:
$ bundle update rspec-rails
RSpec follows semantic versioning,
which means that “major version” upgrades (e.g., 2.x → 3.x)
come with breaking changes.
If you’re upgrading from version 2.x or below,
read the rspec-rails
upgrade notes to find out what to watch out for.
Be sure to check the general RSpec upgrade notes as well.
# RSpec hooks into built-in generators
$ rails generate model user
invoke active_record
create db/migrate/20181017040312_create_users.rb
create app/models/user.rb
invoke rspec
create spec/models/user_spec.rb
# RSpec also provides its own spec file generators
$ rails generate rspec:model user
create spec/models/user_spec.rb
# List all RSpec generators
$ rails generate --help | grep rspec
# Default: Run all spec files (i.e., those matching spec/**/*_spec.rb)
$ bundle exec rspec
# Run all spec files in a single directory (recursively)
$ bundle exec rspec spec/models
# Run a single spec file
$ bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/accounts_controller_spec.rb
# Run a single example from a spec file (by line number)
$ bundle exec rspec spec/controllers/accounts_controller_spec.rb:8
# See all options for running specs
$ bundle exec rspec --help
Optional: If bundle exec rspec
is too verbose for you,
you can generate a binstub at bin/rspec
and use that instead:
$ bundle binstubs rspec-core
In RSpec, application behavior is described first in (almost) plain English, then again in test code, like so:
RSpec.describe 'Post' do #
context 'before publication' do # (almost) plain English
it 'cannot have comments' do #
expect { Post.create.comments.create! }.to raise_error(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid) # test code
end
end
end
Running rspec
will execute this test code,
and then use the plain-English descriptions
to generate a report of where the application
conforms to (or fails to meet) the spec:
$ rspec --format documentation spec/models/post_spec.rb
Post
before publication
cannot have comments
Failures:
1) Post before publication cannot have comments
Failure/Error: expect { Post.create.comments.create! }.to raise_error(ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid)
expected ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid but nothing was raised
# ./spec/models/post.rb:4:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
Finished in 0.00527 seconds (files took 0.29657 seconds to load)
1 example, 1 failure
Failed examples:
rspec ./spec/models/post_spec.rb:3 # Post before publication cannot have comments
For an in-depth look at the RSpec DSL, including lots of examples, read the official Cucumber documentation for RSpec Core.
In RSpec, assertions are called expectations,
and every expectation is built around a matcher.
When you expect(a).to eq(b)
, you’re using the eq
matcher.
In addition to the matchers that come standard in RSpec, here are some extras that make it easier to test the various parts of a Rails system:
RSpec matcher | Delegates to | Available in | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
be_a_new |
all | primarily intended for controller specs | |
render_template |
assert_template |
request / controller / view | use with expect(response).to |
redirect_to |
assert_redirect |
request / controller | use with expect(response).to |
route_to |
assert_recognizes |
routing / controller | use with expect(...).to route_to |
be_routable |
routing / controller | use with expect(...).not_to be_routable |
|
have_http_status |
request / controller / feature | ||
match_array |
all | for comparing arrays of ActiveRecord objects | |
have_been_enqueued |
all | requires config: ActiveJob::Base.queue_adapter = :test |
|
have_enqueued_job |
all | requires config: ActiveJob::Base.queue_adapter = :test |
Follow the links above for examples of how each matcher is used.
For a comprehensive look at RSpec Rails’ features, read the official Cucumber documentation.
RSpec Rails defines ten different types of specs
for testing different parts of a typical Rails application.
Each one inherits from one of Rails’ built-in TestCase
classes,
meaning the helper methods provided by default in Rails tests
are available in RSpec, as well.
Spec type | Corresponding Rails test class |
---|---|
model | |
controller | ActionController::TestCase |
mailer | ActionMailer::TestCase |
job | |
view | ActionView::TestCase |
routing | |
helper | ActionView::TestCase |
request | ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest |
feature | |
system | ActionDispatch::SystemTestCase |
Follow the links above to see examples of each spec type,
or for official Rails API documentation on the given TestCase
class.
Note: This is not a checklist.
Ask a hundred developers how to test an application, and you’ll get a hundred different answers.
RSpec Rails provides thoughtfully selected features to encourage good testing practices, but there’s no “right” way to do it. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide how your test suite will be composed.
When creating a spec file,
assign it a type in the top-level describe
block, like so:
# spec/models/user_spec.rb
RSpec.describe User, type: :model do
...
RSpec Rails provides some end-to-end (entire application) testing capability to specify the interaction with the client.
Also called acceptance tests, browser tests, or end-to-end tests, system specs test the application from the perspective of a human client. The test code walks through a user’s browser interactions,
visit '/login'
fill_in 'Name', with: 'jdoe'
and the expectations revolve around page content.
expect(page).to have_text('Welcome')
Because system specs are a wrapper around Rails’ built-in SystemTestCase
,
they’re only available on Rails 5.1+.
(Feature specs serve the same purpose, but without this dependency.)
Before Rails introduced system testing facilities, feature specs were the only spec type for end-to-end testing. While the RSpec team now officially recommends system specs instead, feature specs are still fully supported, look basically identical, and work on older versions of Rails.
On the other hand, feature specs require non-trivial configuration to get some important features working, like JavaScript testing or making sure each test runs with a fresh DB state. With system specs, this configuration is provided out-of-the-box.
Like system specs, feature specs require the Capybara gem.
Rails 5.1+ includes it by default as part of system tests,
but if you don’t have the luxury of upgrading,
be sure to add it to the :test
group of your Gemfile
first:
group :test do
gem "capybara"
end
Request specs are for testing the application from the perspective of a machine client. They begin with an HTTP request and end with the HTTP response, so they’re faster than feature specs, but do not examine your app’s UI or JavaScript.
Request specs provide a high-level alternative to controller specs. In fact, as of RSpec 3.5, both the Rails and RSpec teams discourage directly testing controllers in favor of functional tests like request specs.
When writing them, try to answer the question, “For a given HTTP request (verb + path + parameters), what HTTP response should the application return?”
Once you’ve cloned the repo and set up the environment, you can run the specs and Cucumber features, or submit a pull request.
- https://github.com/rspec/rspec
- https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core
- https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations
- https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks
- FactoryBot
- Capybara (Included by default in Rails 5.1+. Note that additional configuration is required to use the Capybara DSL anywhere other than system specs and feature specs.)