-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: support multi database feature for op #127
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jingjunLi
force-pushed
the
feat-multi-database
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 23, 2024 06:29
3e49b92
to
6aa2778
Compare
jingjunLi
force-pushed
the
feat-multi-database
branch
from
August 13, 2024 02:42
33e0d3b
to
1e70b17
Compare
jingjunLi
force-pushed
the
feat-multi-database
branch
from
August 28, 2024 04:35
1e70b17
to
b050deb
Compare
* feat: support separate database for state data
* core: use finalized block as the chain freeze indicator (#28683) * core/rawdb: use max(finality, head-90k) as chain freezing threshold * core: impl multi database for block data * core: fix db inspect total size bug * core: add tips for user who use multi-database * core: adapt some cmd for multi-database * core: adapter blockBlobSidecars * core: fix freezer readHeader bug --------- Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <[email protected]>
jingjunLi
force-pushed
the
feat-multi-database
branch
from
October 25, 2024 04:42
bd6b46c
to
598a4f8
Compare
flywukong
previously approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
jingjunLi
force-pushed
the
feat-multi-database
branch
from
October 25, 2024 07:50
94e03a0
to
faab431
Compare
flywukong
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
krish-nr
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
bnoieh
pushed a commit
to bnoieh/op-geth
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
…tion-filter Revert pending subscription filter
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The principle support of PR: BEP-365: Support multi-database based on data pattern
Rationale
tell us why we need these changes...
Example
add an example CLI or API response...
Changes
Notable changes: