Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM-16233] Removing testing tabs and the learn more link #12481

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ttalty
Copy link
Contributor

@ttalty ttalty commented Dec 19, 2024

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-16233

📔 Objective

Removing the testing tabs and the learn more link.

📸 Screenshots

image

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@ttalty ttalty marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 16:18
@ttalty ttalty requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 16:18
@ttalty ttalty enabled auto-merge (squash) December 19, 2024 16:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsfa4ef84d-9553-442d-b26d-d000b1997b40

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

Comment on lines -48 to -56
<bit-tab label="Raw Data">
<tools-password-health></tools-password-health>
</bit-tab>
<bit-tab label="Raw Data + members">
<tools-password-health-members></tools-password-health-members>
</bit-tab>
<bit-tab label="Raw Data + uri">
<tools-password-health-members-uri></tools-password-health-members-uri>
</bit-tab>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of removing them, could we create a local flag (dev,qa) to enable them. I think we are going to find them useful in the future:

  • For QA during testing
  • or a user reporting that things are incorrect/missing on the All Applications report

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an example of how a dev/local flag would work?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General info: https://contributing.bitwarden.com/contributing/feature-flags#flag-data-sources

An example for a devFlag would be the skipWelcomeOnInstall, which is used on browser.

The same works when using a simple flag on the web-client. Extend the environment json (base, development, qa) for your flagName and use the flagEnabled-function to retrieve it's value. The sdk flag being an example on web

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 33.59%. Comparing base (a728331) to head (be3e8f0).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #12481   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   33.59%   33.59%           
=======================================
  Files        2926     2926           
  Lines       91442    91439    -3     
  Branches    17376    17376           
=======================================
+ Hits        30716    30723    +7     
+ Misses      58311    58301   -10     
  Partials     2415     2415           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants