Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
163 remove tree data fix #231
163 remove tree data fix #231
Changes from 4 commits
5693c3c
b53fee2
b1a1abf
d56df15
cd7b373
fb40527
5f879ef
fe8ae6d
9cf9fa7
578b409
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kwcantrell would it be hard to replace the dictionary of dictionaries for a list of lists? It seems like the key for tree data is an index eitherway. In addition, if we can change this:
{'name': 'a', 'x2': 1, 'xc0': 2, 'xc1': 3, 'xr': 4, 'y2': 5, 'yc0': 6, 'yc1': 7, 'yr': 8}
To this:
['a', 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
This should save python from writing all the repeated key data, and save JavaScript from parsing all of that. We would just need to load the data in a container once it's parsed in JavaScript. If this is straightforward to do, then let's do it in this PR otherwise we can defer to a later PR since this goes beyond the original scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good suggestion @ElDeveloper. I'll see if I can change treeData to a list of lists. However, I will need to modify a fair amount of the empress class so we should wait to merge this PR until #230 is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's defer this until later then.