-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
163 remove tree data fix #231
Merged
ElDeveloper
merged 10 commits into
biocore:master
from
kwcantrell:163-remove-tree-data-fix
Jul 7, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5693c3c
removed tree data before name
kwcantrell b53fee2
removed redundant tree_data
kwcantrell b1a1abf
fix comment
kwcantrell d56df15
fixed travis test
kwcantrell cd7b373
moved treeData color init
kwcantrell fb40527
checkpoint-before tree_data refactor
kwcantrell 5f879ef
treedata
kwcantrell fe8ae6d
Revert "treedata"
kwcantrell 9cf9fa7
resolved conflicts
kwcantrell 578b409
fixed tests
kwcantrell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kwcantrell would it be hard to replace the dictionary of dictionaries for a list of lists? It seems like the key for tree data is an index eitherway. In addition, if we can change this:
{'name': 'a', 'x2': 1, 'xc0': 2, 'xc1': 3, 'xr': 4, 'y2': 5, 'yc0': 6, 'yc1': 7, 'yr': 8}
To this:
['a', 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
This should save python from writing all the repeated key data, and save JavaScript from parsing all of that. We would just need to load the data in a container once it's parsed in JavaScript. If this is straightforward to do, then let's do it in this PR otherwise we can defer to a later PR since this goes beyond the original scope.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good suggestion @ElDeveloper. I'll see if I can change treeData to a list of lists. However, I will need to modify a fair amount of the empress class so we should wait to merge this PR until #230 is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's defer this until later then.