throw could be a function

[derekchiang]

Apparently JsBeautifier is making the assumption that throw won't be override, but this is clearly not necessarily true. Consider this piece of code from should.js:

(function(){
  // do something
}).should.not.throw();

This will be beautified to:

(function() {
  // do something
}).should.not.
throw ();

which, of course, will break the code.

[bitwiseman]

Yeah, throw is not a keyword when it follows a ..

Here's another case:

{ throw: true };

Can you think of any others?

This is same thing is true for all keywords, isn't it?

a.should.return(1);

[einars]

Ref #200, "Javascript not fully parsed". I don't think this is actually possible to fix in a good way under the current parser model without some weird error-prone hacks :(

[bitwiseman]

We can fix parts of it, like when a keyword follows a .. Is there a case where this is not true?

We can then file issues for the remaining scenarios and note them the same as you did above.