Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand modified_by and created_by metadata #17

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Expand modified_by and created_by metadata #17

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

j616
Copy link
Contributor

@j616 j616 commented Jan 15, 2024

Details

This PR:

  • Adds a modified_by parameter to flow resources
  • Adds a created_by parameter to flow delete request resources

Pivotal Story

Story URL: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/186711248

Related PRs

Where appropriate. Indicate order to be merged.

Links to external test runs/working deployment

Where appropriate, if separate to default CI run

Submitter PR Checks

(tick as appropriate)

  • Added bbc/rd-apmm-cloudfit team as a reviewer
  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • Tests exercise code appropriately
  • New features and API breaks are flagged in commit messages using magic strings
  • Repo maintainer is notified that a release is required
  • Documentation updated (README, Confluence, Docstrings, API spec, Engineering Guide, etc.)
  • Downstream repos have been checked for potential breaks & fixed as needed
  • APIs/UIs/CLIs updated as required
  • PR added to Pivotal story
  • Follow-up stories added to Pivotal
  • Any temporary code/configuration removed (e.g. test deployment environment, temporary commontooling branch)
  • Any pins against pre-releases have been removed

Reviewer PR Checks

(tick as appropriate)

  • PR completes task/fixes bug
  • Tests exercise code appropriately
  • Design makes sense, and fits with our current code base
  • Code is easy to follow
  • PR size is sensible
  • Commit history is sensible and tidy

Info on Cloudfit PRs

@j616 j616 requested a review from a team January 15, 2024 11:46
@j616 j616 force-pushed the jamessa-modified branch from 3fb55f3 to aa3f668 Compare January 15, 2024 11:49
Copy link
Contributor

@philipnbbc philipnbbc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@j616 j616 force-pushed the jamessa-modified branch from aa3f668 to ccb08d8 Compare January 17, 2024 10:32
@j616 j616 requested a review from philipnbbc January 17, 2024 10:33
@j616
Copy link
Contributor Author

j616 commented Jan 17, 2024

Requesting re-review for added ADR

Copy link
Contributor

@philipnbbc philipnbbc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ADR LGTM. I assume you'll add a commit to change the ADR status to "accepted"? Does it make sense to just start it off at "accepted" in this PR as the ADR and solution are bundled together?

@j616
Copy link
Contributor Author

j616 commented Jan 17, 2024

@philipnbbc The ADR README describes the process. TL;DR: The discussion/modification happens in the PR. The ADR status is then updated just before the PR merges. The ADR could be rejected but still merged as capturing why we didn't do something can be as important as capturing why we did do something.

Copy link
Member

@samdbmg samdbmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, including use of ADR template

@robwadge robwadge assigned robwadge and unassigned robwadge Jan 17, 2024
@j616 j616 force-pushed the jamessa-modified branch from f0791ce to 2349edc Compare January 18, 2024 11:07
@j616 j616 merged commit ecaee9e into main Jan 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@j616 j616 deleted the jamessa-modified branch January 18, 2024 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants