Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): v2.173.2 #32557

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

chore(release): v2.173.2 #32557

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

HBobertz
Copy link
Contributor

See CHANGELOG

…ials (#32552)

Plugins that return V2 credentials objects, return credentials that are self-refreshing. Those credentials can start out empty, which is perfectly valid.

We shouldn't reject them if they are.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
…32554)

According to the type definitions, the `expiration` field of V3 AWS credentials must be `undefined` or `Date`, but we are running into situations in reality where the value is `null`, leading to the error:

```
TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'getTime')
```

Survive that specific case.

----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
@HBobertz HBobertz added the pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it label Dec 17, 2024
@HBobertz HBobertz requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2024 19:26
@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Dec 17, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team December 17, 2024 19:26
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Dec 17, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Dec 17, 2024
@HBobertz HBobertz added pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested and removed pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. labels Dec 17, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review December 17, 2024 19:42

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-cli-test-run This PR needs CLI tests run against it. label Dec 17, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 522334f
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be automatically updated and merged without squashing (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mergify mergify bot merged commit f8e6207 into v2-release Dec 17, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the patch/v2.173.2 branch December 17, 2024 20:39
Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2 pr/no-squash This PR should be merged instead of squash-merging it pr-linter/cli-integ-tested Assert that any CLI changes have been integ tested pr-linter/exempt-integ-test The PR linter will not require integ test changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants