fix(appsync): appsync.HttpDataSourceProps erroneously extends BaseDataSourceProps

[ScottRobinson03]

Reason for this change

Closes #31979.
Replaces #29689.

In #11185, the HttpDataSource class was updated to extend BackedDataSource instead of BaseDataSource, however the HttpDataSourceProps type wasn't updated to reflect this change. This PR makes the HttpDataSourceProps type reflect the change.

Description of changes

Makes the HttpDataSourceProps type extend BackedDataSourceProps, instead of BaseDataSourceProps. This means users are able to provide the serviceRole prop without getting a type error.

Description of how you validated changes

The below code snippet no longer gives an incorrect type error when providing the serviceRole, as it did before:

import * as appsync from "aws-cdk-lib/aws-appsync";
import type { IRole } from "aws-cdk-lib/aws-iam";

declare const myApi: appsync.GraphqlApi;
declare const serviceRole: IRole;

const stepFunctionHttpDataSource = new appsync.HttpDataSource(
    myApi,
    "MyStepFunctionHTTPDataSource",
    {
        api: myApi,
        authorizationConfig: {
            signingRegion: "eu-west-1",
            signingServiceName: "states",
        },
        endpoint: `https://states.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com`,
        name: "StepFunctionHTTPDataSource",
        // Providing the `serviceRole` now correctly DOESN'T throw a type error
        serviceRole,
    }
);

[aws-cdk-automation]

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

[ScottRobinson03]

Exemption Request

This PR only fixes a TypeScript type, so there's no runtime code to integrate test.

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Pull request has been modified.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.66%. Comparing base (c5bcfdc) to head (3d6583f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #32065      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.67%   78.66%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines        7237     7237              
  Branches     1329     1329              
==========================================
- Hits         5694     5693       -1     
- Misses       1357     1358       +1     
  Partials      186      186              

Flag	Coverage Δ
suite.unit	78.66% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk	78.66% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

[ScottRobinson03]

@gracelu0 Looks like the codegen check is still "broken" (this was an issue in my previous PR too). Are you able to look into this?

[gracelu0]

@Mergifyio update

[mergify]

update

✅ Branch has been successfully updated

[aws-cdk-automation]

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

• CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
• Commit ID: 3d6583f
• Result: SUCCEEDED
• Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

[mergify]

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).