You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When defining an EKS cluster, the `vpc` property is now
optional. If not specified, a VPC will be defined with
the default configuration for this environment.
It can then be accessed through `cluster.vpc`.
Fixes#3541
When defining an EKS cluster, the `vpc` property is now
optional. If not specified, a VPC will be defined with
the default configuration for this environment.
It can then be accessed through `cluster.vpc`.
Fixes#3541
* feat(eks): default vpc
When defining an EKS cluster, the `vpc` property is now
optional. If not specified, a VPC will be defined with
the default configuration for this environment.
It can then be accessed through `cluster.vpc`.
Fixes#3541
* feat(eks): default capacity
By default, allocate 2x m5.large instances when defining an EKS cluster. This can be configured
through `defaultCapacity` and `defaultCapacityInstance` or by setting `defaultCapacity` to `0`
and invoking `cluster.addCapacity`.
BREAKING CHANGE: clusters will be created with a default capacity of x2 m5.large instances. You can specify `defaultCapacity: 0` if you wish to disable.
* Fix typo
* fix a few merge errors
I'm submitting a ...
What is the current behavior?
When an EKS cluster is defined, users need to explicitly specify the VPC and explicitly add capacity to the cluster.
Originally posted by @arun-gupta in #3510
What is the expected behavior (or behavior of feature suggested)?
Make
ClusterProps.vpc
optional (and define a default vpc)Automatically define initial capacity unless this feature is disabled (we need to think of the right API).
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior or adding this feature?
We want to make it easier for users to get started with sensible defaults, similar to how eksctl works.
Please tell us about your environment:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: