Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SIP-89] Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache Superset #21050

Closed
jileeon opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[SIP-89] Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache Superset #21050

jileeon opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
sip Superset Improvement Proposal

Comments

@jileeon
Copy link
Contributor

jileeon commented Aug 11, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Motivation

To manage roles, permissions, and users automatically via APIs

Proposed Change

Initialize them using appbuilder extension.

New or Changed Public Interfaces

Yes. These APIs can be used on Apache Superset Web Service. See the screenshot below.

스크린샷 2022-08-11 오후 2 59 57

New dependencies

Already satisfied with Superset 2.0

Migration Plan and Compatibility

N/A

Rejected Alternatives

N/A
jileeon pushed a commit to jileeon/superset that referenced this issue Aug 11, 2022
@jileeon88
Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache…
e325b56 
… Superset (apache#21050)
@jileeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jileeon commented Aug 11, 2022

References:

This was referenced Aug 11, 2022
Closed
Closed
@jileeon jileeon changed the title [SIP-88] Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache Superset [SIP-89] Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache Superset Aug 12, 2022
jileeon pushed a commit to jileeon/superset that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2022
@jileeon88
Integrate role, permission, user APIs on Flask-AppBuilder into Apache…
9b1bf50 
… Superset (apache#21050)
@rusackas rusackas added the sip Superset Improvement Proposal label Jun 7, 2023
@apache apache deleted a comment from trixieboyle Oct 3, 2023
@rusackas
Copy link
Member

rusackas commented Oct 3, 2023

@jileeon it sounds like this effort might not be needed any more, if I'm understanding the comments on your closed PRs. Is there any need/intent to carry this SIP forward and initiate a discussion and vote on the Apache mailing list?

@jileeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

jileeon commented Nov 6, 2023

@rusackas, it is no longer needed. please close it. thanks.

@rusackas rusackas closed this as completed Feb 1, 2024
@rusackas rusackas moved this from Pre-discussion to Denied / Closed / Discarded in SIPs (Superset Improvement Proposals) Apr 3, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot mentioned this issue May 7, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
sip Superset Improvement Proposal
Projects
SIPs (Superset Improvement Proposals)
Status: Denied / Closed / Discarded
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rusackas @jileeon