Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-22311 - Update community docs to recommend use of "Co-authored-… #235

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 25 additions & 7 deletions src/main/asciidoc/_chapters/developer.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2300,19 +2300,37 @@ message is in their patch and you can use that, but be sure the JIRA ID is at
the front of the commit message, even if the contributor left it out.

[[committer.amending.author]]
====== Add Amending-Author when a conflict cherrypick backporting
====== Use GitHub's "Co-authored-by" when there are multiple authors

We've established the practice of committing to master and then cherry picking back to branches whenever possible, unless

* it's breaking compat: In which case, if it can go in minor releases, backport to branch-1 and branch-2.
* it's a new feature: No for maintenance releases, For minor releases, discuss and arrive at consensus.

When there is a minor conflict we can fix it up and just proceed with the commit.
HorizonNet marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
The resulting commit retains the original author.
When the amending author is different from the original committer, add notice of this at the end of the commit message as: `Amending-Author: Author
<committer&apache>` See discussion at link:http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4wHGYS[HBase, mail # dev
- [DISCUSSION] Best practice when amending commits cherry picked
from master to branch].
There are occasions when there are multiple author for a patch.
For example when there is a minor conflict we can fix it up and just proceed with the commit.
The amending author will be different from the original committer, so you should also attribute to the original author by
adding one or more `Co-authored-by` trailers to the commit's message.
See link:https://help.github.com/en/articles/creating-a-commit-with-multiple-authors/[the GitHub documentation for "Creating a commit with multiple authors"].

In short, these are the steps to add Co-authors that will be tracked by GitHub:

. Collect the name and email address for each co-author.
. Commit the change, but after your commit description, instead of a closing quotation, add two empty lines. (Do not close the commit message with a quotation mark)
. On the next line of the commit message, type `Co-authored-by: name <[email protected]>`. After the co-author information, add a closing quotation mark.

Here is the example from the GitHub page, using 2 Co-authors:
[source,xml]
----
$ git commit -m "Refactor usability tests.
>
>
Co-authored-by: name <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: another-name <[email protected]>"
----

Note: `Amending-Author: Author <committer@apache>` was used prior to this
link:https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f00b5f9b65570e777dbb31c37d7b0ffc55c5fc567aefdb456608a042@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E[DISCUSSION].

====== Close related GitHub PRs

Expand Down