HADOOP-18342: upgrade to avro 1.11.0

[pjfanning]

Description of PR

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18342

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

• Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
• Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
• If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
• If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 46s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 0s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 0s		detect-secrets was not available.
+0 🆗	xmllint	0m 0s		xmllint was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	38m 58s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 20s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	compile	0m 19s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 25s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 29s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 22s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	shadedclient	61m 5s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 13s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 14s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javac	0m 14s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 15s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	0m 15s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 14s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 15s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 13s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
-1 ❌	shadedclient	3m 55s		patch has errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	0m 13s		hadoop-project in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 30s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		69m 5s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4581/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#4581
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient codespell detsecrets xmllint
uname	Linux fe4b374f6400 4.15.0-169-generic #177-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 3 10:50:38 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 0eb5565
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-11.0.15+10-Ubuntu-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_312-8u312-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4581/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	644 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-project U: hadoop-project
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-4581/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[ayushtkn]

Avro upgrade creates some problem. It got a -1 from @xkrogen here:
#4580 (comment)
Unless there is any CVE or so, I think we should stay away from it

[pjfanning]

I'll close this then

[xkrogen]

Just to be clear, I am not generally -1 on Avro upgrades. #4580 would have bumped the Avro major version in a maintenance release of Hadoop; a major Avro version bump is way too big of a change to go into a maintenance release. I would not take the same stack for an upgrade in trunk, which would go into a minor release.

Though notably Avro 1.11.0 has at least one major performance issue, which we have found to be severe enough internally at LinkedIn to specifically disallow use of this version: AVRO-3243. So I would recommend that we avoid any Avro 1.11 adoption until 1.11.1 is available.