Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor: Fix name in ArrayFunctionRewriter, error not panic if Expr::GetStructField is planned #10564

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ fn create_physical_name(e: &Expr, is_first_expr: bool) -> Result<String> {
match field {
GetFieldAccess::NamedStructField { name: _ } => {
unreachable!(
"NamedStructField should have been rewritten in OperatorToFunction"
"NamedStructField should have been rewritten in ArrayFunctionRewriter"
)
}
GetFieldAccess::ListIndex { key: _ } => {
unreachable!(
"ListIndex should have been rewritten in OperatorToFunction"
"ListIndex should have been rewritten in ArrayFunctionRewriter"
)
}
GetFieldAccess::ListRange {
Expand All @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ fn create_physical_name(e: &Expr, is_first_expr: bool) -> Result<String> {
stride: _,
} => {
unreachable!(
"ListRange should have been rewritten in OperatorToFunction"
"ListRange should have been rewritten in ArrayFunctionRewriter"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OperatorToFunction was the old name for these functions I think

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, now that I think about this I think the issue is that we now expect that these Exprs should never be present....

I think they can still be created via Expr::field(name)...

Will double check / see if I can make a reproduicer

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed -- it panics here: #10565

)
}
};
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion datafusion/functions-array/src/rewrite.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ pub(crate) struct ArrayFunctionRewriter {}

impl FunctionRewrite for ArrayFunctionRewriter {
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"FunctionRewrite"
"ArrayFunctionRewriter"
}

fn rewrite(
Expand Down
Loading