Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-12704: [JS] Support and use optional chaining #10278

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

domoritz
Copy link
Member

@domoritz domoritz commented May 8, 2021

Optional chaining makes the code more concise and easier to reason about.

Needs a fork of esm because of standard-things/esm#866.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2021

@domoritz domoritz changed the title ARROW-12704: [JS] use optional chaining ARROW-12704: [JS] Support and use optional chaining May 8, 2021
Co-authored-by: P42 <72252241+p42-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dominik Moritz <[email protected]>
@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented May 15, 2021

@domoritz Could you also rebase on master and update the pull request description?

@domoritz
Copy link
Member Author

I merged master and updated the description.

@domoritz
Copy link
Member Author

I also merged this branch into the follow-up at #10281. No idea why this one is failing.

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented May 16, 2021

Thanks. These failures are unrelated.

@kou kou closed this in f039931 May 16, 2021
michalursa pushed a commit to michalursa/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2021
Optional chaining makes the code more concise and easier to reason about.

Needs a fork of esm because of standard-things/esm#866.

Closes apache#10278 from domoritz/modern-js

Lead-authored-by: Dominik Moritz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: p42-ai[bot] <72252241+p42-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants