Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add recipe for BeamRunGoPipelineOperator #22296

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 17, 2022

Conversation

pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member

closes: #21545

Hello,

Here is a first draft of the go-beam recipe that allows you to run beam pipeline written in go.

I tested it locally with the direct runner. Everything seems fine.

Let me know what you think,
Best,

@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun requested a review from potiuk as a code owner March 15, 2022 22:58
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes kind:documentation labels Mar 15, 2022
@pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member Author

@mik-laj Thank you for your comments.

I just updated the PR, let me know what you think.

@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun force-pushed the 21545-add-recipe-for-go branch from e07a6c9 to 76a0c06 Compare March 16, 2022 21:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Mar 17, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@mik-laj mik-laj merged commit 4a1503b into apache:main Mar 17, 2022
shuhoy pushed a commit to shuhoy/airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2022
@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun deleted the 21545-add-recipe-for-go branch March 23, 2022 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Go to docker images
2 participants