Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update zip dependency #62

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

agostbiro
Copy link
Contributor

The previous version of the zip package has an outdated
transitive Rust Crypto dependency that conflicts with newer
Rust Crytpo crates.

The master branch of the zip package already contains the new
Rust Crytpo dependencies, but it's waiting
for a release for three months now so I've specified the latest
commit in the master branch as the zip version.

@agostbiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

The cargo-bins team started a hopefully temporarily fork of the zip project. @roynalnaruto would you be ok with replacing zip with binstall-zip as they did here?

Copy link
Member

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a reasonable request, could eventually impact ethers-rs as well.

binstall-zip is published on crates.io so instead of importing via git, let's apply the same change that was added here cargo-bins/cargo-binstall#375

@agostbiro agostbiro closed this Sep 26, 2022
agostbiro added a commit to agostbiro/svm-rs that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2022
The previous version of the zip package has an outdated transitive Rust Crypto
dependency that conflicts with newer Rust Crytpo crates, so it's important to
update.

The master branch of the `zip` package already contains the new Rust Crytpo
dependencies, but it's been waiting for a release for three months now so this
commit switches to the updated `binstall-zip` fork by the `cargo-bins` team.

Fore more context, please see: alloy-rs#62
@agostbiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

cheers @mattsse , started a new pr here: #65

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants