Fixes a lot of the errors raised by ruff

[Psycojoker]

Ruff isn't running on this project for various reason and it raises a LOT of errors.

This PR fixes a good part of the errors but not all of them but all this improvements can already be merged so we can benefit from it.

Related ClickUp, GitHub or Jira tickets : ALEPH-127

Self proofreading checklist

• The new code clear, easy to read and well commented.
• All new code is covered by relevant tests.

[github-actions]

Failed to retrieve llama text: POST 504:

504 Gateway Time-out

The server didn't respond in time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 38.70968% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.31%. Comparing base (bc41292) to head (54cbee7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/aleph_client/commands/instance/__init__.py	23.80%	16 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/utils.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/instance/display.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/message.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/utils.py	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/__init__.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/aggregate.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/domain.py	66.66%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/models.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/aleph_client/commands/program.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #275      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.56%   38.31%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          18       18              
  Lines        1932     1939       +7     
  Branches      335      335              
==========================================
- Hits          745      743       -2     
- Misses       1151     1160       +9     
  Partials       36       36              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hoh]

I am wondering if we should not update filter_only_valid_messages to use generics 🤔

[Psycojoker]

I'm not sure it's in the scope of this PR? We probably want to use Sequence instead of list for it as a type anyway

[Psycojoker]

@hoh what version of python do we target? Right now it's stucked on 3.9 and some new notation aren't supported, I want to know if I need to revert them.