Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.5] misc docs fix - background tasks example throws a deprecation warning (#3529) #3531

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2019

Conversation

asvetlov
Copy link
Member

(cherry picked from commit 2d8aa12)

Co-authored-by: Goran Cetušić [email protected]

…arning (#3529)

(cherry picked from commit 2d8aa12)

Co-authored-by: Goran Cetušić <[email protected]>
@asvetlov asvetlov requested a review from webknjaz as a code owner January 13, 2019 14:05
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3531 into 3.5 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.5    #3531   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.92%   97.92%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        8565     8565           
  Branches     1382     1382           
=======================================
  Hits         8387     8387           
  Misses         72       72           
  Partials      106      106

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f6f647e...42aaec5. Read the comment docs.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit c6ee1a7 into 3.5 Jan 13, 2019
@asvetlov asvetlov deleted the backport-2d8aa12-3.5 branch January 13, 2019 15:49
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 13, 2020

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been
any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for
related bugs.

If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion,
please include those exceprts into that new issue.

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Jan 13, 2020
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2020
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Jan 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR outdated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants