Add SEO meta to website pages #88
Comments
bronz3beard
added
enhancement
|
This looks good to me @bronz3beard - I'm assuming this would just cover meta tags. Have we set up Google Tag Manager? Maybe that's a separate issue. |
Yep, just meta tags, GTM is in staging but i don't know if it is setup on google? maybe @camposcristianeze knows about this? |
|
GTM should be all good to go from my memory of what @camposcristianeze did with it a few months back .... essentially would be using the same container as the current live site. @lulen11 if you can create a post go live checklist and put this on it, to confirm Analytics is tracking, that would be great 🙏🏻 |
Nope. All we have from GTM was for that rushed Global release on We didn't test this on v5 as we changed de architecture back then. Should be a matter of just adding the containers in the same way as v4 and testing. The url for that is https://tagmanager.google.com/ and everyone on the team should have access to it. But in any case there's no relation between SEO tags and this so that should be a completely different issue. |
Okay finding context for SEO is a bit sparse, so I want to bring it altogether here.
We need to add SEO to the new website.
Currently this is managed by craft in v-4, we don't want that for v-5.
We have this file here: SEO Tags JSON
We have this comment here [Comment](#4 (comment)
Also there is this short video directive from Cris here
So I think the best idea would be to use the NextJs
<Head><meta... /></Head>componentimport Head from 'next/head';the hoc component would look some thing like this:Then something like
react-helmetto override those parent tags per page,ReactHelmetcan get the info from the static json which we will build out as per Cris's video, from the files extracted by Kevin from Craft.@lulen11 @camposcristianeze @mischacolley @kbardi
Let me know if this is the best plan of attack for this and please add anything missing or any further ideas/guidance for moving forward with adding SEO tags to site.
p.s.there is discussion and a vision for having Contentful possibly handle some tags but its only a vision/idea right now.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: