-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Ember v5 by addin @ember/string to peerDependencies #547
Merged
SergeAstapov
merged 9 commits into
adopted-ember-addons:master
from
jelhan:support-ember-v4
Nov 29, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
40fe84b
support Ember v4
jelhan f08602a
Merge branch 'require-node-18' into support-ember-v4
jelhan c2fa85a
@ember/string v4 is not compatible with Ember < 3.28
jelhan a3c70ec
add @ember/string as peer dep and run tests for Ember v5
jelhan 2c48089
ember-resolver v8 is not compatible with Ember v5
jelhan 8deec87
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into support-ember-v4
jelhan 9cc8469
downgrade to @ember/string v3
jelhan 84e1ef4
Merge branch 'upgrade-with-ember-cli-4.12-blueprints' into support-em…
jelhan aca19c4
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into support-ember-v4
jelhan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jelhan shouldn't we add the whole matrix of LTS versions in v4 and v5, like 4.4, 4.8, 5.4, 5.8?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a realistic risk that it works for 4.12 and 5.12 but not for interim releases? CI minutes are free for open source projects on GitHub. But we should nevertheless review the value for each scenario as they have other trade-offs such as environmental impact.
Happy to add if you feel they provide real value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jelhan very good question and considering ember-source had very little changes during v4 and v5, I guess answer is "no". It's more like a convention I've seen around in the ecosystem and been following for the addons I've tried to maintain.