Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Basic SpokePool verification task (#582) #702

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pxrl
Copy link
Contributor

@pxrl pxrl commented Oct 28, 2024

This task intends to automate reading a small number of variables from the SpokePool on a given chain. This is currently limited to the set of common variables that are shared amongst all SpokePool deployments, but could be extended to query chain-specific SpokePool variables.

This should be run by any operator deploying a SpokePool to a new chain, and may also be integrated into CI.


pxrl added 2 commits October 28, 2024 17:07
This has some limitations around USDC native/bridged coincidence, but
should otherwise be useful for testing chain adapters for new
deployments (where CCTP is very unlikely to be enabled anyway).
This task intends to automate reading a small number of variables from
the SpokePool on a given chain. This is currently limited to the set of
common variables that are shared amongst all SpokePool deployments, but
could be extended to query chain-specific SpokePool variables.

This should be run by any operator deploying a SpokePool to a new chain,
and may also be integrated into CI.

---------

Signed-off-by: Paul <[email protected]>
@pxrl pxrl requested a review from bmzig October 28, 2024 17:10
Base automatically changed from pxrl/verify to audit-latest October 28, 2024 18:33
@pxrl pxrl merged commit 48f1fef into audit-latest Oct 28, 2024
11 checks passed
@pxrl pxrl deleted the pxrl/verify2 branch October 28, 2024 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants