-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GetByKey needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names #342
Comments
We can't completely generalize it, but this will get us close:
And for any oddball scenarios
|
Grauenwolf
changed the title
GetByKey needs to be reworked
GetByKey/DeleteByKey needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names
Jan 31, 2020
Grauenwolf
changed the title
GetByKey/DeleteByKey needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names
GetByKey/DeleteByKey/DeleteWithFilter needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names
Jan 31, 2020
Grauenwolf
changed the title
GetByKey/DeleteByKey/DeleteWithFilter needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names
GetByKey needs to be reworked to not need explicit table names
Jan 31, 2020
See also #348 |
Grauenwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 9, 2020
GetByKey should NOT call GetByKeyList #343
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Here is the current syntax
Notice how the table name is mentioned twice, once directly and once in the materializer.
We want this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: