Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACE fails to build on Travis trusty #174

Closed
KrisThielemans opened this issue Dec 9, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #176
Closed

ACE fails to build on Travis trusty #174

KrisThielemans opened this issue Dec 9, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #176
Assignees

Comments

@KrisThielemans
Copy link
Member

Example log (with -j 2 unfortunately). ACE building seems to be ok but ends with

ACE_Qt4Reactor_moc will not be built due to the following disabled make macros: qt4
GNUmakefile: /home/travis/build/CCPPETMR/SIRF-SuperBuild/builds/ACE/build/source/ace/QtReactor/GNUmakefile.ACE_Qt4Reactor_moc MAKEFLAGS=s

make[5]: *** [stamp/ACE-build] Error 141
@KrisThielemans
Copy link
Member Author

@paskino, is this as in #144?

Fixable by going to CMake 3.9 or later on Travis? #162, #103

@KrisThielemans KrisThielemans changed the title ACE fails to build on Travis trusty (tested with gcc-7) ACE fails to build on Travis trusty Dec 13, 2018
KrisThielemans added a commit to SyneRBI/SIRF that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2018
ACE fails to build currently
SyneRBI/SIRF-SuperBuild#174
but system ACE is too old for gcc-7
SyneRBI/SIRF-SuperBuild#169
KrisThielemans added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2018
- upgrade CMake in .travis.yml to 3.13.1 (partially addresses #162)
- always build boost on linux as the system boost is too old on Trusty (Ubuntu 14.04) 
- don't build ACE as it currently fails (#174)
- make sure Travis fails if running CMake fails (fixed #175)
paskino added a commit to paskino/SIRF-SuperBuild that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants