[EOS-5812] Fix DNS configuration when using resolvconf_mode='host_resolvconf' during scale #23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
unai-ttxu
changed the title
resolvconf_mode='host_resolvconf' during scale
…olvconf' during scale
unai-ttxu
force-pushed
the
release-2.16
branch
from
2c82fb1 to
4b23387
Compare
unai-ttxu
changed the title
resolvconf_mode='host_resolvconf' during scale
unai-ttxu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2021
…olvconf' during scale (#23)
unai-ttxu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2022
unai-ttxu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2022
unai-ttxu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2022
…olvconf' during scale (#23)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: