Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support to run 800MHz speed grade parts at 650MHz #19

Conversation

neerajdantu
Copy link

This patch allows running 800MHz speed grade superset devices at 650MHz by adding OPP hardware ID of 800MHz speed grade parts to 650MHz OPP table.

@BernardPuel
Copy link

Hello Neerajdantu,
it is a big mistake to do so because MP15xa are not qualified to run at this speed.

So your chip may not work at all at this speed and at least its lifetime will be hardly reduced; see: https://wiki.st.com/stm32mpu/wiki/STM32MP15_microprocessor

@BernardPuel BernardPuel closed this Dec 5, 2022
@neerajdantu
Copy link
Author

Hello Bernard,

My apologies in advance, can you provide a little more feedback? The patch is intended to run higher speed grade parts(800MHz) at lower speed grade(650MHz) and not the other way around. 0x2 is the ID for 800MHz part, is added to 650MHz OPP. This will allow superset devices like STM32MP157F to be run at STM32MP157C speeds in case users want to use same firmware for both variants. Note that 7F variants have 800MHz and 400MHz OPPs defined. Running 7F at 650MHz should not be a problem?

Thanks,
Neeraj

@BernardPuel
Copy link

BernardPuel commented Dec 6, 2022

Hello Neerajdantu,
Sorry I read too quickly. You are right 800Hz product can go to 650 Hz without issue.
But we cannot accept your patch anyway because this is not generic and we define one DT per Soc statically so anyway, if you want to manage both 15xa and 15xf, you will need 2 dts.

mcarlin-ds pushed a commit to DatumSystems/linux that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 4e264be ]

When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following
hang may be observed.

 Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver:
 PID: 1        TASK: ffff965400e5a340  CPU: 24   COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow"
  #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb
  #1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d
  #2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc
  #3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930
  #4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf]
  #5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513
  #6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa
  #7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc
  #8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e
  #9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429
 #10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4
 #11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice]
 #12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice]
 STMicroelectronics#13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice]
 STMicroelectronics#14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1
 STMicroelectronics#15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386
 STMicroelectronics#16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870
 STMicroelectronics#17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6
 STMicroelectronics#18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159
 STMicroelectronics#19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc
 STMicroelectronics#20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d
 STMicroelectronics#21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169
 STMicroelectronics#22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b
     RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7  RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98  RFLAGS: 00000202
     RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7
     RDX: 0000000001234567  RSI: 0000000028121969  RDI: 00000000fee1dead
     RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 00007fffbcc54e90
     R10: 00007fffbcc55050  R11: 0000000000000202  R12: 0000000000000005
     R13: 0000000000000000  R14: 00007fffbcc55af0  R15: 0000000000000000
     ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9  CS: 0033  SS: 002b

During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked.
In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE.
In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point
calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one
of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If
that's not the case it sleeps forever.
So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before iavf_remove() the system will
hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE.

Fix this by returning from iavf_remove() if the state is __IAVF_REMOVE,
as we already went through iavf_shutdown().

Fixes: 9745780 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove")
Fixes: a841733 ("iavf: Fix race condition between iavf_shutdown and iavf_remove")
Reported-by: Marius Cornea <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds pushed a commit to DatumSystems/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 56077b5 ]

When doing link mtu negotiation, a malicious peer may send Activate msg
with a very small mtu, e.g. 4 in Shuang's testing, without checking for
the minimum mtu, l->mtu will be set to 4 in tipc_link_proto_rcv(), then
n->links[bearer_id].mtu is set to 4294967228, which is a overflow of
'4 - INT_H_SIZE - EMSG_OVERHEAD' in tipc_link_mss().

With tipc_link.mtu = 4, tipc_link_xmit() kept printing the warning:

 tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 5 0 40 4!
 tipc: Too large msg, purging xmit list 1 15 0 60 4!

And with tipc_link_entry.mtu 4294967228, a huge skb was allocated in
named_distribute(), and when purging it in tipc_link_xmit(), a crash
was even caused:

  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x2100001011000dd: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.3.0.neta STMicroelectronics#19
  RIP: 0010:kfree_skb_list_reason+0x7e/0x1f0
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   skb_release_data+0xf9/0x1d0
   kfree_skb_reason+0x40/0x100
   tipc_link_xmit+0x57a/0x740 [tipc]
   tipc_node_xmit+0x16c/0x5c0 [tipc]
   tipc_named_node_up+0x27f/0x2c0 [tipc]
   tipc_node_write_unlock+0x149/0x170 [tipc]
   tipc_rcv+0x608/0x740 [tipc]
   tipc_udp_recv+0xdc/0x1f0 [tipc]
   udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0x33e/0x620
   udp_unicast_rcv_skb.isra.72+0x75/0x90
   __udp4_lib_rcv+0x56d/0xc20
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x100/0x2d0

This patch fixes it by checking the new mtu against tipc_bearer_min_mtu(),
and not updating mtu if it is too small.

Fixes: ed193ec ("tipc: simplify link mtu negotiation")
Reported-by: Shuang Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds pushed a commit to DatumSystems/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit e3e82fc ]

When creating ceq_0 during probing irdma, cqp.sc_cqp will be sent as a
cqp_request to cqp->sc_cqp.sq_ring. If the request is pending when
removing the irdma driver or unplugging its aux device, cqp.sc_cqp will be
dereferenced as wrong struct in irdma_free_pending_cqp_request().

  PID: 3669   TASK: ffff88aef892c000  CPU: 28  COMMAND: "kworker/28:0"
   #0 [fffffe0000549e38] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff810e3a34
   #1 [fffffe0000549e40] nmi_handle at ffffffff810788b2
   #2 [fffffe0000549ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff8107938f
   #3 [fffffe0000549eb8] do_nmi at ffffffff81079582
   #4 [fffffe0000549ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff82e016b4
      [exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+1291]
      RIP: ffffffff8127e72b  RSP: ffff88aa841ef778  RFLAGS: 00000046
      RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff88b01f849700  RCX: ffffffff8127e47e
      RDX: 0000000000000000  RSI: 0000000000000004  RDI: ffffffff83857ec0
      RBP: ffff88afe3e4efc8   R8: ffffed15fc7c9dfa   R9: ffffed15fc7c9dfa
      R10: 0000000000000001  R11: ffffed15fc7c9df9  R12: 0000000000740000
      R13: ffff88b01f849708  R14: 0000000000000003  R15: ffffed1603f092e1
      ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0000
  -- <NMI exception stack> --
   #5 [ffff88aa841ef778] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8127e72b
   #6 [ffff88aa841ef7b0] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff82c22aa4
   #7 [ffff88aa841ef7c8] __wake_up_common_lock at ffffffff81257363
   #8 [ffff88aa841ef888] irdma_free_pending_cqp_request at ffffffffa0ba12cc [irdma]
   #9 [ffff88aa841ef958] irdma_cleanup_pending_cqp_op at ffffffffa0ba1469 [irdma]
   #10 [ffff88aa841ef9c0] irdma_ctrl_deinit_hw at ffffffffa0b2989f [irdma]
   #11 [ffff88aa841efa28] irdma_remove at ffffffffa0b252df [irdma]
   #12 [ffff88aa841efae8] auxiliary_bus_remove at ffffffff8219afdb
   STMicroelectronics#13 [ffff88aa841efb00] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff821882e6
   STMicroelectronics#14 [ffff88aa841efb38] bus_remove_device at ffffffff82184278
   STMicroelectronics#15 [ffff88aa841efb88] device_del at ffffffff82179d23
   STMicroelectronics#16 [ffff88aa841efc48] ice_unplug_aux_dev at ffffffffa0eb1c14 [ice]
   STMicroelectronics#17 [ffff88aa841efc68] ice_service_task at ffffffffa0d88201 [ice]
   STMicroelectronics#18 [ffff88aa841efde8] process_one_work at ffffffff811c589a
   STMicroelectronics#19 [ffff88aa841efe60] worker_thread at ffffffff811c71ff
   STMicroelectronics#20 [ffff88aa841eff10] kthread at ffffffff811d87a0
   STMicroelectronics#21 [ffff88aa841eff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff82e0022f

Fixes: 44d9e52 ("RDMA/irdma: Implement device initialization definitions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Suggested-by: "Ismail, Mustafa" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shifeng Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants