Fix ina2xx driver shunt voltage reporting. #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2022
[ Upstream commit 447c799 ] Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10 GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation locks. [ +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh torvalds#1030 Not tainted [ +0.000004] -------------------------------------------- [ +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock: [ +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000203] but task is already holding lock: [ +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000017] other info that might help us debug this: [ +0.000002] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ +0.000003] CPU0 [ +0.000002] ---- [ +0.000002] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000004] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000003] *** DEADLOCK *** [ +0.000002] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822: [ +0.000003] #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000232] #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000241] #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000236] #3: ffffb2b35606fd28 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000235] #4: ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000015] #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at: drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm] [ +0.000038] #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000195] stack backtrace: [ +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh torvalds#1030 [ +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02 08/29/2018 [ +0.000003] Call Trace: [ +0.000003] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 [ +0.000010] __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90 [ +0.000009] lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0 [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060 [ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000005] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000185] ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm] [ +0.000010] amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu] [ +0.000229] ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu] [ +0.000190] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000234] kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000218] kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000006] ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0 [ +0.000007] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0 [ +0.000007] do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70 [ +0.000004] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317 [ +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX: 00007fbff90a7317 [ +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fbcc402d880 [ +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c0184b18 [ +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15: 00007fbcc402d820 Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Cc: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2022
[ Upstream commit af68656 ] While handling PCI errors (AER flow) driver tries to disable NAPI [napi_disable()] after NAPI is deleted [__netif_napi_del()] which causes unexpected system hang/crash. System message log shows the following: ======================================= [ 3222.537510] EEH: Detected PCI bus error on PHB#384-PE#800000 [ 3222.537511] EEH: This PCI device has failed 2 times in the last hour and will be permanently disabled after 5 failures. [ 3222.537512] EEH: Notify device drivers to shutdown [ 3222.537513] EEH: Beginning: 'error_detected(IO frozen)' [ 3222.537514] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen) [ 3222.537516] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth14)]IO error detected [ 3222.537650] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): bnx2x driver reports: 'need reset' [ 3222.537651] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): Invoking bnx2x->error_detected(IO frozen) [ 3222.537651] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_error_detected:14236(eth13)]IO error detected [ 3222.537729] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.1): bnx2x driver reports: 'need reset' [ 3222.537729] EEH: Finished:'error_detected(IO frozen)' with aggregate recovery state:'need reset' [ 3222.537890] EEH: Collect temporary log [ 3222.583481] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.0 [ 3222.583519] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.583557] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow: [ 3222.583744] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da2 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.583892] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.583893] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows: [ 3222.584079] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.584230] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.584378] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584416] EEH: of node=0384:80:00.1 [ 3222.584454] EEH: PCI device/vendor: 168e14e4 [ 3222.584491] EEH: PCI cmd/status register: 00100140 [ 3222.584492] EEH: PCI-E capabilities and status follow: [ 3222.584677] EEH: PCI-E 00: 00020010 012c8da2 00095d5e 00455c82 [ 3222.584825] EEH: PCI-E 10: 10820000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E 20: 00000000 [ 3222.584826] EEH: PCI-E AER capability register set follows: [ 3222.585011] EEH: PCI-E AER 00: 13c10001 00000000 00000000 00062030 [ 3222.585160] EEH: PCI-E AER 10: 00002000 000031c0 000001e0 00000000 [ 3222.585309] EEH: PCI-E AER 20: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.585347] EEH: PCI-E AER 30: 00000000 00000000 [ 3222.586872] RTAS: event: 5, Type: Platform Error (224), Severity: 2 [ 3222.586873] EEH: Reset without hotplug activity [ 3224.762767] EEH: Beginning: 'slot_reset' [ 3224.762770] EEH: PE#800000 (PCI 0384:80:00.0): Invoking bnx2x->slot_reset() [ 3224.762771] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14271(eth14)]IO slot reset initializing... [ 3224.762887] bnx2x 0384:80:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) [ 3224.768157] bnx2x: [bnx2x_io_slot_reset:14287(eth14)]IO slot reset --> driver unload Uninterruptible tasks ===================== crash> ps | grep UN 213 2 11 c000000004c89e00 UN 0.0 0 0 [eehd] 215 2 0 c000000004c80000 UN 0.0 0 0 [kworker/0:2] 2196 1 28 c000000004504f00 UN 0.1 15936 11136 wickedd 4287 1 9 c00000020d076800 UN 0.0 4032 3008 agetty 4289 1 20 c00000020d056680 UN 0.0 7232 3840 agetty 32423 2 26 c00000020038c580 UN 0.0 0 0 [kworker/26:3] 32871 4241 27 c0000002609ddd00 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd 32920 10130 16 c00000027284a100 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail 33092 32987 0 c000000205218b00 UN 0.1 48512 12608 sendmail 33154 4567 16 c000000260e51780 UN 0.1 48832 12864 pickup 33209 4241 36 c000000270cb6500 UN 0.1 18624 11712 sshd 33473 33283 0 c000000205211480 UN 0.1 48512 12672 sendmail 33531 4241 37 c00000023c902780 UN 0.1 18624 11648 sshd EEH handler hung while bnx2x sleeping and holding RTNL lock =========================================================== crash> bt 213 PID: 213 TASK: c000000004c89e00 CPU: 11 COMMAND: "eehd" #0 [c000000004d477e0] __schedule at c000000000c70808 #1 [c000000004d478b0] schedule at c000000000c70ee0 #2 [c000000004d478e0] schedule_timeout at c000000000c76dec #3 [c000000004d479c0] msleep at c0000000002120cc #4 [c000000004d479f0] napi_disable at c000000000a06448 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ #5 [c000000004d47a30] bnx2x_netif_stop at c0080000018dba94 [bnx2x] #6 [c000000004d47a60] bnx2x_io_slot_reset at c0080000018a551c [bnx2x] #7 [c000000004d47b20] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004c9bc #8 [c000000004d47b90] eeh_pe_report at c00000000004d1a8 #9 [c000000004d47c40] eeh_handle_normal_event at c00000000004da64 And the sleeping source code ============================ crash> dis -ls c000000000a06448 FILE: ../net/core/dev.c LINE: 6702 6697 { 6698 might_sleep(); 6699 set_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); 6700 6701 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state)) * 6702 msleep(1); 6703 while (test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &n->state)) 6704 msleep(1); 6705 6706 hrtimer_cancel(&n->timer); 6707 6708 clear_bit(NAPI_STATE_DISABLE, &n->state); 6709 } EEH calls into bnx2x twice based on the system log above, first through bnx2x_io_error_detected() and then bnx2x_io_slot_reset(), and executes the following call chains: bnx2x_io_error_detected() +-> bnx2x_eeh_nic_unload() +-> bnx2x_del_all_napi() +-> __netif_napi_del() bnx2x_io_slot_reset() +-> bnx2x_netif_stop() +-> bnx2x_napi_disable() +->napi_disable() Fix this by correcting the sequence of NAPI APIs usage, that is delete the NAPI after disabling it. Fixes: 7fa6f34 ("bnx2x: AER revised") Reported-by: David Christensen <[email protected]> Tested-by: David Christensen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
commit 60eed1e upstream. code path: ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents ocfs2_move_extents ocfs2_defrag_extent __ocfs2_move_extent + ocfs2_journal_access_di + ocfs2_split_extent //sub-paths call jbd2_journal_restart + ocfs2_journal_dirty //crash by jbs2 ASSERT crash stacks: PID: 11297 TASK: ffff974a676dcd00 CPU: 67 COMMAND: "defragfs.ocfs2" #0 [ffffb25d8dad3900] machine_kexec at ffffffff8386fe01 #1 [ffffb25d8dad3958] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8395959d #2 [ffffb25d8dad3a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff8395a45d #3 [ffffb25d8dad3a38] oops_end at ffffffff83836d3f #4 [ffffb25d8dad3a58] do_trap at ffffffff83833205 #5 [ffffb25d8dad3aa0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff83833aa6 #6 [ffffb25d8dad3ac0] invalid_op at ffffffff84200d18 [exception RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x2ba] RIP: ffffffffc09ca54a RSP: ffffb25d8dad3b70 RFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9706eedc5248 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff97337029ea28 RDI: ffff9706eedc5250 RBP: ffff9703c3520200 R8: 000000000f46b0b2 R9: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000001000000fe R12: ffff97337029ea28 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9703de59bf60 R15: ffff9706eedc5250 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #7 [ffffb25d8dad3ba8] ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc137fb95 [ocfs2] #8 [ffffb25d8dad3be8] __ocfs2_move_extent at ffffffffc139a950 [ocfs2] #9 [ffffb25d8dad3c80] ocfs2_defrag_extent at ffffffffc139b2d2 [ocfs2] Analysis This bug has the same root cause of 'commit 7f27ec9 ("ocfs2: call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before ocfs2_journal_dirty() in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()")'. For this bug, jbd2_journal_restart() is called by ocfs2_split_extent() during defragmenting. How to fix For ocfs2_split_extent() can handle journal operations totally by itself. Caller doesn't need to call journal access/dirty pair, and caller only needs to call journal start/stop pair. The fix method is to remove journal access/dirty from __ocfs2_move_extent(). The discussion for this patch: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2023-February/000647.html Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 3dca1f8 ] Don't hold sdw_dev_lock while calling the peripheral driver probe() and remove() callbacks. Holding sdw_dev_lock around the probe() and remove() calls causes a theoretical mutex inversion which lockdep will assert on. During probe() the sdw_dev_lock mutex is taken first and then ASoC/ALSA locks are taken by the probe() implementation. During normal operation ASoC can take its locks and then trigger a runtime resume of the component. The SoundWire resume will then take sdw_dev_lock. This is the reverse order compared to probe(). It's not necessary to hold sdw_dev_lock when calling the probe() and remove(), it is only used to prevent the bus core calling the driver callbacks if there isn't a driver or the driver is removing. All calls to the driver callbacks are guarded by the 'probed' flag. So if sdw_dev_lock is held while setting and clearing the 'probed' flag this is sufficient to guarantee the safety of callback functions. Removing the mutex from around the call to probe() means that it is now possible for a bus event (PING response) to be handled in parallel with the probe(). But sdw_bus_probe() already has handling for this by calling the device update_status() after the probe() has completed. Example lockdep assert: [ 46.098514] ====================================================== [ 46.104736] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 46.110961] 6.1.0-rc4-jamerson #1 Tainted: G E [ 46.116842] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 46.123063] mpg123/1130 is trying to acquire lock: [ 46.127883] ffff8b445031fb80 (&slave->sdw_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.137225] but task is already holding lock: [ 46.143074] ffffffffc1455310 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpcm_fe_dai_open+0x49/0x830 [ 46.151536] which lock already depends on the new lock.[ 46.159732] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 46.167231] -> #4 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.173428] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.177542] snd_soc_dpcm_runtime_update+0x2e/0x100 [ 46.182958] snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double+0x1c2/0x200 [ 46.188548] snd_ctl_elem_write+0x10c/0x1d0 [ 46.193268] snd_ctl_ioctl+0x126/0x850 [ 46.197556] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 [ 46.201845] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.205959] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.211553] -> #3 (&card->controls_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 46.218188] down_write+0x2b/0xd0 [ 46.222038] snd_ctl_add_replace+0x39/0xb0 [ 46.226672] snd_soc_add_controls+0x53/0x80 [ 46.231393] soc_probe_component+0x1e4/0x2a0 [ 46.236202] snd_soc_bind_card+0x51a/0xc80 [ 46.240836] devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x43/0x90 [ 46.246079] mc_probe+0x982/0xfe0 [snd_soc_sof_sdw] [ 46.251500] platform_probe+0x3c/0xa0 [ 46.255700] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.259814] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.264710] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.269347] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.273721] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.278098] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.282473] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.286759] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.291136] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.295422] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.300321] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.304434] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.310027] -> #2 (&card->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.315883] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.320000] snd_soc_bind_card+0x3e/0xc80 [ 46.324551] devm_snd_soc_register_card+0x43/0x90 [ 46.329798] mc_probe+0x982/0xfe0 [snd_soc_sof_sdw] [ 46.335219] platform_probe+0x3c/0xa0 [ 46.339420] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.343532] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.348430] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.353065] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.357437] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.361812] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.366716] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.371528] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.376424] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.381239] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.386665] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.391299] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.397416] -> #1 (client_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.404307] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.408941] snd_soc_add_component+0x24/0x2c0 [ 46.414345] devm_snd_soc_register_component+0x54/0xa0 [ 46.420522] cs35l56_common_probe+0x280/0x370 [snd_soc_cs35l56] [ 46.427487] cs35l56_sdw_probe+0xf4/0x170 [snd_soc_cs35l56_sdw] [ 46.434442] sdw_drv_probe+0x80/0x1a0 [ 46.439136] really_probe+0xde/0x390 [ 46.443738] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x180 [ 46.449120] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 [ 46.454247] __driver_attach+0x9f/0x1f0 [ 46.459106] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0 [ 46.463971] bus_add_driver+0x1ac/0x200 [ 46.468825] driver_register+0x8f/0xf0 [ 46.473592] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x310 [ 46.478441] do_init_module+0x4c/0x1f0 [ 46.483202] __do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130 [ 46.488572] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.493158] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.499229] -> #0 (&slave->sdw_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 46.506737] __lock_acquire+0x1121/0x1df0 [ 46.511765] lock_acquire+0xd5/0x300 [ 46.516360] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.520949] sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.526409] sdw_clear_slave_status+0xd8/0xe0 [ 46.531783] intel_resume_runtime+0x139/0x2a0 [ 46.537155] __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120 [ 46.541919] rpm_callback+0x5d/0x70 [ 46.546422] rpm_resume+0x531/0x7e0 [ 46.550920] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80 [ 46.556024] snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get+0x2f/0xc0 [ 46.562611] __soc_pcm_open+0x62/0x520 [ 46.567375] dpcm_be_dai_startup+0x116/0x210 [ 46.572661] dpcm_fe_dai_open+0xf7/0x830 [ 46.577597] snd_pcm_open_substream+0x54a/0x8b0 [ 46.583145] snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xdc/0x200 [ 46.588341] snd_pcm_playback_open+0x51/0x80 [ 46.593625] chrdev_open+0xc0/0x250 [ 46.598129] do_dentry_open+0x15f/0x430 [ 46.602981] path_openat+0x75e/0xa80 [ 46.607575] do_filp_open+0xb2/0x160 [ 46.612162] do_sys_openat2+0x9a/0x160 [ 46.616922] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 46.621767] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.626352] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.632414] other info that might help us debug this:[ 46.641862] Chain exists of: &slave->sdw_dev_lock --> &card->controls_rwsem --> &card->pcm_mutex[ 46.655145] Possible unsafe locking scenario:[ 46.662048] CPU0 CPU1 [ 46.667080] ---- ---- [ 46.672108] lock(&card->pcm_mutex); [ 46.676267] lock(&card->controls_rwsem); [ 46.683382] lock(&card->pcm_mutex); [ 46.690063] lock(&slave->sdw_dev_lock); [ 46.694574] *** DEADLOCK ***[ 46.701942] 2 locks held by mpg123/1130: [ 46.706356] #0: ffff8b4457b22b90 (&pcm->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xc9/0x200 [ 46.715999] #1: ffffffffc1455310 (&card->pcm_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpcm_fe_dai_open+0x49/0x830 [ 46.725390] stack backtrace: [ 46.730752] CPU: 0 PID: 1130 Comm: mpg123 Tainted: G E 6.1.0-rc4-jamerson #1 [ 46.739703] Hardware name: AAEON UP-WHL01/UP-WHL01, BIOS UPW1AM19 11/10/2020 [ 46.747270] Call Trace: [ 46.750239] <TASK> [ 46.752857] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73 [ 46.757045] check_noncircular+0x102/0x120 [ 46.761664] __lock_acquire+0x1121/0x1df0 [ 46.766197] lock_acquire+0xd5/0x300 [ 46.770292] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.775432] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140 [ 46.780143] __mutex_lock+0x94/0x920 [ 46.784241] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.789387] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 46.793750] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.798894] ? lock_release+0x147/0x2f0 [ 46.803262] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x250 [ 46.808315] ? sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.813456] sdw_update_slave_status+0x26/0x70 [ 46.818422] sdw_clear_slave_status+0xd8/0xe0 [ 46.823302] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.828706] intel_resume_runtime+0x139/0x2a0 [ 46.833583] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [ 46.838462] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.843866] __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120 [ 46.848142] ? pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x30/0x30 [ 46.853550] rpm_callback+0x5d/0x70 [ 46.857568] rpm_resume+0x531/0x7e0 [ 46.861578] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x62/0x70 [ 46.866634] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80 [ 46.871258] snd_soc_pcm_component_pm_runtime_get+0x2f/0xc0 [ 46.877358] __soc_pcm_open+0x62/0x520 [ 46.881634] ? dpcm_add_paths.isra.0+0x35d/0x4c0 [ 46.886784] dpcm_be_dai_startup+0x116/0x210 [ 46.891592] dpcm_fe_dai_open+0xf7/0x830 [ 46.896046] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x50 [ 46.900591] snd_pcm_open_substream+0x54a/0x8b0 [ 46.905658] snd_pcm_open.part.0+0xdc/0x200 [ 46.910376] ? wake_up_q+0x90/0x90 [ 46.914312] snd_pcm_playback_open+0x51/0x80 [ 46.919118] chrdev_open+0xc0/0x250 [ 46.923147] ? cdev_device_add+0x90/0x90 [ 46.927608] do_dentry_open+0x15f/0x430 [ 46.931976] path_openat+0x75e/0xa80 [ 46.936086] do_filp_open+0xb2/0x160 [ 46.940194] ? lock_release+0x147/0x2f0 [ 46.944563] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50 [ 46.949101] do_sys_openat2+0x9a/0x160 [ 46.953377] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 46.957733] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 46.961829] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 46.967402] RIP: 0033:0x7fa6397ccd3b [ 46.971506] Code: 25 00 00 41 00 3d 00 00 41 00 74 4b 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 67 44 89 e2 48 89 ee bf 9c ff ff ff b8 01 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 0f 87 91 00 00 00 48 8b 4c 24 28 64 48 33 0c 25 [ 46.991413] RSP: 002b:00007fff838e8990 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 [ 46.999580] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000080802 RCX: 00007fa6397ccd3b [ 47.007311] RDX: 0000000000080802 RSI: 00007fff838e8b50 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c [ 47.015047] RBP: 00007fff838e8b50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000011 [ 47.022787] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000080802 [ 47.030539] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff838e8b50 [ 47.038289] </TASK> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 13085e1 ] The following LOCKDEP was detected: Workqueue: events smc_lgr_free_work [smc] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.1.0-20221027.rc2.git8.56bc5b569087.300.fc36.s390x+debug #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/3:0/176251 is trying to acquire lock: 00000000f1467148 ((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_workqueue+0x7a/0x4f0 but task is already holding lock: 0000037fffe97dc8 ((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 ((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __flush_work+0x76/0xf0 __cancel_work_timer+0x170/0x220 __smc_lgr_terminate.part.0+0x34/0x1c0 [smc] smc_connect_rdma+0x15e/0x418 [smc] __smc_connect+0x234/0x480 [smc] smc_connect+0x1d6/0x230 [smc] __sys_connect+0x90/0xc0 __do_sys_socketcall+0x186/0x370 __do_syscall+0x1da/0x208 system_call+0x82/0xb0 -> #3 (smc_client_lgr_pending){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __mutex_lock+0x96/0x8e8 mutex_lock_nested+0x32/0x40 smc_connect_rdma+0xa4/0x418 [smc] __smc_connect+0x234/0x480 [smc] smc_connect+0x1d6/0x230 [smc] __sys_connect+0x90/0xc0 __do_sys_socketcall+0x186/0x370 __do_syscall+0x1da/0x208 system_call+0x82/0xb0 -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_SMC){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 lock_sock_nested+0x46/0xa8 smc_tx_work+0x34/0x50 [smc] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&(&smc->conn.tx_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 process_one_work+0x2bc/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 -> #0 ((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0xd8/0xe88 validate_chain+0x70c/0xb20 __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 __flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x4f0 drain_workqueue+0xaa/0x158 destroy_workqueue+0x44/0x2d8 smc_lgr_free+0x9e/0xf8 [smc] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 worker_thread+0x62/0x420 kthread+0x138/0x150 __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2 --> smc_client_lgr_pending --> (work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&(&lgr->free_work)->work)); lock(smc_client_lgr_pending); lock((work_completion) (&(&lgr->free_work)->work)); lock((wq_completion)smc_tx_wq-00000000#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/3:0/176251: #0: 0000000080183548 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 #1: 0000037fffe97dc8 ((work_completion) (&(&lgr->free_work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x232/0x730 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 176251 Comm: kworker/3:0 Not tainted Hardware name: IBM 8561 T01 701 (z/VM 7.2.0) Call Trace: [<000000002983c3e4>] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0x100 [<0000000028b477ae>] check_noncircular+0x13e/0x160 [<0000000028b48808>] check_prev_add+0xd8/0xe88 [<0000000028b49cc4>] validate_chain+0x70c/0xb20 [<0000000028b4bd26>] __lock_acquire+0x58e/0xbd8 [<0000000028b4cf6a>] lock_acquire.part.0+0xe2/0x248 [<0000000028b4d17c>] lock_acquire+0xac/0x1c8 [<0000000028addaaa>] __flush_workqueue+0xaa/0x4f0 [<0000000028addf9a>] drain_workqueue+0xaa/0x158 [<0000000028ae303c>] destroy_workqueue+0x44/0x2d8 [<000003ff8029af26>] smc_lgr_free+0x9e/0xf8 [smc] [<0000000028adf3d4>] process_one_work+0x30c/0x730 [<0000000028adf85a>] worker_thread+0x62/0x420 [<0000000028aeac50>] kthread+0x138/0x150 [<0000000028a63914>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58 [<00000000298503da>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40 INFO: lockdep is turned off. =================================================================== This deadlock occurs because cancel_delayed_work_sync() waits for the work(&lgr->free_work) to finish, while the &lgr->free_work waits for the work(lgr->tx_wq), which needs the sk_lock-AF_SMC, that is already used under the mutex_lock. The solution is to use cancel_delayed_work() instead, which kills off a pending work. Fixes: a52bcc9 ("net/smc: improve termination processing") Signed-off-by: Wenjia Zhang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jan Karcher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 2b4cc3d ] The check introduced in the commit a5fd394 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule restriction") can detect a false positive error in some corner case. For instance, tc qdisc replace ... taprio num_tc 4 ... sched-entry S 0x01 100000 # slot#1 sched-entry S 0x03 100000 # slot#2 sched-entry S 0x04 100000 # slot#3 sched-entry S 0x08 200000 # slot#4 flags 0x02 # hardware offload Here the queue#0 (the first queue) is on at the slot#1 and #2, and off at the slot#3 and #4. Under the current logic, when the slot#4 is examined, validate_schedule() returns *false* since the enablement count for the queue#0 is two and it is already off at the previous slot (i.e. #3). But this definition is truely correct. Let's fix the logic to enforce a strict validation for consecutively-opened slots. Fixes: a5fd394 ("igc: Lift TAPRIO schedule restriction") Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <[email protected]> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email protected]> Tested-by: Naama Meir <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2023
[ Upstream commit 4e264be ] When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following hang may be observed. Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver: PID: 1 TASK: ffff965400e5a340 CPU: 24 COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow" #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb #1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d #2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc #3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930 #4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf] #5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513 #6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa #7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc #8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e #9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429 #10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4 #11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice] #12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice] STMicroelectronics#13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice] STMicroelectronics#14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1 STMicroelectronics#15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386 STMicroelectronics#16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870 STMicroelectronics#17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6 STMicroelectronics#18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159 STMicroelectronics#19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc STMicroelectronics#20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d STMicroelectronics#21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169 STMicroelectronics#22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7 RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98 RFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7 RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 00007fffbcc54e90 R10: 00007fffbcc55050 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fffbcc55af0 R15: 0000000000000000 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9 CS: 0033 SS: 002b During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked. In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE. In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If that's not the case it sleeps forever. So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before iavf_remove() the system will hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE. Fix this by returning from iavf_remove() if the state is __IAVF_REMOVE, as we already went through iavf_shutdown(). Fixes: 9745780 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove") Fixes: a841733 ("iavf: Fix race condition between iavf_shutdown and iavf_remove") Reported-by: Marius Cornea <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 91d6a46 ] gpi_ch_init() doesn't lock the ctrl_lock mutex, so there is no need to unlock it too. Instead the mutex is handled by the function gpi_alloc_chan_resources(), which properly locks and unlocks the mutex. ===================================== WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 6.3.0-rc5-00253-g99792582ded1-dirty STMicroelectronics#15 Not tainted ------------------------------------- kworker/u16:0/9 is trying to release lock (&gpii->ctrl_lock) at: [<ffffb99d04e1284c>] gpi_alloc_chan_resources+0x108/0x5bc but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 6 locks held by kworker/u16:0/9: #0: ffff575740010938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x220/0x594 #1: ffff80000809bdd0 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x220/0x594 #2: ffff575740f2a0f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x188 #3: ffff57574b5570f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach+0x38/0x188 #4: ffffb99d06a2f180 (of_dma_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: of_dma_request_slave_channel+0x138/0x280 #5: ffffb99d06a2ee20 (dma_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_get_slave_channel+0x28/0x10c stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc5-00253-g99792582ded1-dirty STMicroelectronics#15 Hardware name: Google Pixel 3 (DT) Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xa0/0xfc show_stack+0x18/0x24 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0x130/0x148 lock_release+0x270/0x300 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x48/0x2cc mutex_unlock+0x20/0x2c gpi_alloc_chan_resources+0x108/0x5bc dma_chan_get+0x84/0x188 dma_get_slave_channel+0x5c/0x10c gpi_of_dma_xlate+0x110/0x1a0 of_dma_request_slave_channel+0x174/0x280 dma_request_chan+0x3c/0x2d4 geni_i2c_probe+0x544/0x63c platform_probe+0x68/0xc4 really_probe+0x148/0x2ac __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0 driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x160 __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x138 bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0 __device_attach+0x9c/0x188 device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 bus_probe_device+0xac/0xb0 device_add+0x60c/0x7d8 of_device_add+0x44/0x60 of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x90/0x124 of_platform_bus_create+0x15c/0x3c8 of_platform_populate+0x58/0xf8 devm_of_platform_populate+0x58/0xbc geni_se_probe+0xf0/0x164 platform_probe+0x68/0xc4 really_probe+0x148/0x2ac __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0 driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x160 __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x138 bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0 __device_attach+0x9c/0x188 device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 bus_probe_device+0xac/0xb0 deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xc8 process_one_work+0x2bc/0x594 worker_thread+0x228/0x438 kthread+0x108/0x10c ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Fixes: 5d0c353 ("dmaengine: qcom: Add GPI dma driver") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 05bb016 ] ACPICA commit 770653e3ba67c30a629ca7d12e352d83c2541b1e Before this change we see the following UBSAN stack trace in Fuchsia: #0 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 #1.2 0x000020d0f660777f in ubsan_get_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:41 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f #1.1 0x000020d0f660777f in maybe_print_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:51 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f #1 0x000020d0f660777f in ~scoped_report() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:387 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x3d77f #2 0x000020d0f660b96d in handlepointer_overflow_impl() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:809 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4196d #3 0x000020d0f660b50d in compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:815 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x4150d #4 0x000021e4213b3302 in acpi_ds_init_aml_walk(struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*, struct acpi_namespace_node*, u8*, u32, struct acpi_evaluate_info*, u8) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dswstate.c:682 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x233302 #5 0x000021e4213e2369 in acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state*, struct acpi_walk_state*, union acpi_parse_object*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/dispatcher/dsmethod.c:605 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x262369 #6 0x000021e421437fac in acpi_ps_parse_aml(struct acpi_walk_state*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psparse.c:550 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2b7fac #7 0x000021e4214464d2 in acpi_ps_execute_method(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/parser/psxface.c:244 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2c64d2 #8 0x000021e4213aa052 in acpi_ns_evaluate(struct acpi_evaluate_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nseval.c:250 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x22a052 #9 0x000021e421413dd8 in acpi_ns_init_one_device(acpi_handle, u32, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:735 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x293dd8 #10 0x000021e421429e98 in acpi_ns_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type, acpi_handle, u32, u32, acpi_walk_callback, acpi_walk_callback, void*, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nswalk.c:298 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a9e98 #11 0x000021e4214131ac in acpi_ns_initialize_devices(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/namespace/nsinit.c:268 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2931ac #12 0x000021e42147c40d in acpi_initialize_objects(u32) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/utilities/utxfinit.c:304 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2fc40d STMicroelectronics#13 0x000021e42126d603 in acpi::acpi_impl::initialize_acpi(acpi::acpi_impl*) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/acpi-impl.cc:224 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0xed603 Add a simple check that avoids incrementing a pointer by zero, but otherwise behaves as before. Note that our findings are against ACPICA 20221020, but the same code exists on master. Link: acpica/acpica@770653e3 Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2023
[ Upstream commit 4f082a7 ] This combines the overflow and boundary check so that all attribute size will be properly examined while enumerating them. [ 169.181521] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in run_unpack+0x2e3/0x570 [ 169.183161] Read of size 1 at addr ffff8880094b6240 by task mount/247 [ 169.184046] [ 169.184925] CPU: 0 PID: 247 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.0.0-rc7+ #3 [ 169.185908] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 169.187066] Call Trace: [ 169.187492] <TASK> [ 169.188049] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 [ 169.188495] print_report.cold+0xf5/0x689 [ 169.188964] ? run_unpack+0x2e3/0x570 [ 169.189331] kasan_report+0xa7/0x130 [ 169.189714] ? run_unpack+0x2e3/0x570 [ 169.190079] __asan_load1+0x51/0x60 [ 169.190634] run_unpack+0x2e3/0x570 [ 169.191290] ? run_pack+0x840/0x840 [ 169.191569] ? run_lookup_entry+0xb3/0x1f0 [ 169.192443] ? mi_enum_attr+0x20a/0x230 [ 169.192886] run_unpack_ex+0xad/0x3e0 [ 169.193276] ? run_unpack+0x570/0x570 [ 169.193557] ? ni_load_mi+0x80/0x80 [ 169.193889] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [ 169.194236] ? mi_init+0x4a/0x70 [ 169.194496] attr_load_runs_vcn+0x166/0x1c0 [ 169.194851] ? attr_data_write_resident+0x250/0x250 [ 169.195188] mi_read+0x133/0x2c0 [ 169.195481] ntfs_iget5+0x277/0x1780 [ 169.196017] ? call_rcu+0x1c7/0x330 [ 169.196392] ? ntfs_get_block_bmap+0x70/0x70 [ 169.196708] ? evict+0x223/0x280 [ 169.197014] ? __kmalloc+0x33/0x540 [ 169.197305] ? wnd_init+0x15b/0x1b0 [ 169.197599] ntfs_fill_super+0x1026/0x1ba0 [ 169.197994] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 169.198299] ? vsprintf+0x20/0x20 [ 169.198583] ? mutex_unlock+0x81/0xd0 [ 169.198930] ? set_blocksize+0x95/0x150 [ 169.199269] get_tree_bdev+0x232/0x370 [ 169.199750] ? put_ntfs+0x1d0/0x1d0 [ 169.200094] ntfs_fs_get_tree+0x15/0x20 [ 169.200431] vfs_get_tree+0x4c/0x130 [ 169.200714] path_mount+0x654/0xfe0 [ 169.201067] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 169.201358] ? finish_automount+0x2e0/0x2e0 [ 169.201965] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 169.202445] ? kmem_cache_free+0x1c4/0x440 [ 169.203075] ? putname+0x80/0xa0 [ 169.203414] do_mount+0xd6/0xf0 [ 169.203719] ? path_mount+0xfe0/0xfe0 [ 169.203977] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20 [ 169.204382] __x64_sys_mount+0xca/0x110 [ 169.204711] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 169.205059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [ 169.205571] RIP: 0033:0x7f67a80e948a [ 169.206327] Code: 48 8b 0d 11 fa 2a 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 008 [ 169.208296] RSP: 002b:00007ffddf020f58 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [ 169.209253] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055e2547a6060 RCX: 00007f67a80e948a [ 169.209777] RDX: 000055e2547a6260 RSI: 000055e2547a62e0 RDI: 000055e2547aeaf0 [ 169.210342] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055e2547a6280 R09: 0000000000000020 [ 169.210843] R10: 00000000c0ed0000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 000055e2547aeaf0 [ 169.211307] R13: 000055e2547a6260 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff [ 169.211913] </TASK> [ 169.212304] [ 169.212680] Allocated by task 0: [ 169.212963] (stack is not available) [ 169.213200] [ 169.213472] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880094b5e00 [ 169.213472] which belongs to the cache UDP of size 1152 [ 169.214095] The buggy address is located 1088 bytes inside of [ 169.214095] 1152-byte region [ffff8880094b5e00, ffff8880094b6280) [ 169.214639] [ 169.215004] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [ 169.215766] page:000000002e324c8c refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x94b4 [ 169.218412] head:000000002e324c8c order:2 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 [ 169.219078] flags: 0xfffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) [ 169.220272] raw: 000fffffc0010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffff888002409b40 [ 169.221006] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000800c000c 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 169.222320] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 169.222922] [ 169.223119] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 169.224056] ffff8880094b6100: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 169.224908] ffff8880094b6180: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 169.225677] >ffff8880094b6200: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 169.226445] ^ [ 169.227055] ffff8880094b6280: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc [ 169.227638] ffff8880094b6300: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb Signed-off-by: Edward Lo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Komarov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2023
commit 614ce6a upstream. When the dwc3 device is runtime suspended, various required clocks are in disabled state and it is not guaranteed that access to any registers would work. Depending on the SoC glue, a register read could be as benign as returning 0 or be fatal enough to hang the system. In order to prevent such scenarios of fatal errors, make sure to resume dwc3 then allow the function to proceed. Fixes: 72246da ("usb: Introduce DesignWare USB3 DRD Driver") Cc: [email protected] #3.2: 30332ee: debugfs: regset32: Add Runtime PM support Signed-off-by: Udipto Goswami <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]> Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2024
commit dd976a9 upstream. The smp_processor_id() shouldn't be called from preemptible code. Instead use get_cpu() and put_cpu() which disables preemption in addition to getting the processor id. Enable preemption back after calling schedule_work() to make sure that the work gets scheduled on all cores other than the current core. We want to avoid a scenario where current core's stack trace is printed multiple times and one core's stack trace isn't printed because of scheduling of current task. This fixes the following bug: [ 119.143590] sysrq: Show backtrace of all active CPUs [ 119.143902] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/873 [ 119.144586] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30 [ 119.144827] CPU: 6 PID: 873 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.10.124-dirty #3 [ 119.144861] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 2023.05-1 07/22/2023 [ 119.145053] Call trace: [ 119.145093] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0 [ 119.145122] show_stack+0x18/0x70 [ 119.145141] dump_stack+0xc4/0x11c [ 119.145159] check_preemption_disabled+0x100/0x110 [ 119.145175] debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30 [ 119.145195] sysrq_handle_showallcpus+0x20/0xc0 [ 119.145211] __handle_sysrq+0x8c/0x1a0 [ 119.145227] write_sysrq_trigger+0x94/0x12c [ 119.145247] proc_reg_write+0xa8/0xe4 [ 119.145266] vfs_write+0xec/0x280 [ 119.145282] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100 [ 119.145298] __arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x30 [ 119.145315] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x78/0x1e4 [ 119.145332] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x8c [ 119.145348] el0_svc+0x10/0x20 [ 119.145364] el0_sync_handler+0x134/0x140 [ 119.145381] el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0 Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Fixes: 47cab6a ("debug lockups: Improve lockup detection, fix generic arch fallback") Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2024
commit 5a22fbc upstream. When LAN9303 is MDIO-connected two callchains exist into mdio->bus->write(): 1. switch ports 1&2 ("physical" PHYs): virtual (switch-internal) MDIO bus (lan9303_switch_ops->phy_{read|write})-> lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write} -> mdiobus_{read|write}_nested 2. LAN9303 virtual PHY: virtual MDIO bus (lan9303_phy_{read|write}) -> lan9303_virt_phy_reg_{read|write} -> regmap -> lan9303_mdio_{read|write} If the latter functions just take mutex_lock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock) it triggers a LOCKDEP false-positive splat. It's false-positive because the first mdio_lock in the second callchain above belongs to virtual MDIO bus, the second mdio_lock belongs to physical MDIO bus. Consequent annotation in lan9303_mdio_{read|write} as nested lock (similar to lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write}, it's the same physical MDIO bus) prevents the following splat: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u4:3/609 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000011531c68 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_lock_mutex but task is already holding lock: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested lan9303_mdio_read _regmap_read regmap_read lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork -> #0 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by kworker/u4:3/609: #0: ffff000002842938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #1: ffff80000bacbd60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #2: ffff000007645178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach #3: ffff8000096e6e78 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dsa_register_switch #4: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 609 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.15.71 #1 Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: dump_backtrace show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe ... Cc: [email protected] Fixes: dc70058 ("net: dsa: LAN9303: add MDIO managed mode support") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit e3e82fc ] When creating ceq_0 during probing irdma, cqp.sc_cqp will be sent as a cqp_request to cqp->sc_cqp.sq_ring. If the request is pending when removing the irdma driver or unplugging its aux device, cqp.sc_cqp will be dereferenced as wrong struct in irdma_free_pending_cqp_request(). PID: 3669 TASK: ffff88aef892c000 CPU: 28 COMMAND: "kworker/28:0" #0 [fffffe0000549e38] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff810e3a34 #1 [fffffe0000549e40] nmi_handle at ffffffff810788b2 #2 [fffffe0000549ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff8107938f #3 [fffffe0000549eb8] do_nmi at ffffffff81079582 #4 [fffffe0000549ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff82e016b4 [exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+1291] RIP: ffffffff8127e72b RSP: ffff88aa841ef778 RFLAGS: 00000046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88b01f849700 RCX: ffffffff8127e47e RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff83857ec0 RBP: ffff88afe3e4efc8 R8: ffffed15fc7c9dfa R9: ffffed15fc7c9dfa R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed15fc7c9df9 R12: 0000000000740000 R13: ffff88b01f849708 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: ffffed1603f092e1 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000 -- <NMI exception stack> -- #5 [ffff88aa841ef778] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff8127e72b #6 [ffff88aa841ef7b0] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff82c22aa4 #7 [ffff88aa841ef7c8] __wake_up_common_lock at ffffffff81257363 #8 [ffff88aa841ef888] irdma_free_pending_cqp_request at ffffffffa0ba12cc [irdma] #9 [ffff88aa841ef958] irdma_cleanup_pending_cqp_op at ffffffffa0ba1469 [irdma] #10 [ffff88aa841ef9c0] irdma_ctrl_deinit_hw at ffffffffa0b2989f [irdma] #11 [ffff88aa841efa28] irdma_remove at ffffffffa0b252df [irdma] #12 [ffff88aa841efae8] auxiliary_bus_remove at ffffffff8219afdb STMicroelectronics#13 [ffff88aa841efb00] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff821882e6 STMicroelectronics#14 [ffff88aa841efb38] bus_remove_device at ffffffff82184278 STMicroelectronics#15 [ffff88aa841efb88] device_del at ffffffff82179d23 STMicroelectronics#16 [ffff88aa841efc48] ice_unplug_aux_dev at ffffffffa0eb1c14 [ice] STMicroelectronics#17 [ffff88aa841efc68] ice_service_task at ffffffffa0d88201 [ice] STMicroelectronics#18 [ffff88aa841efde8] process_one_work at ffffffff811c589a STMicroelectronics#19 [ffff88aa841efe60] worker_thread at ffffffff811c71ff STMicroelectronics#20 [ffff88aa841eff10] kthread at ffffffff811d87a0 STMicroelectronics#21 [ffff88aa841eff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff82e0022f Fixes: 44d9e52 ("RDMA/irdma: Implement device initialization definitions") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Suggested-by: "Ismail, Mustafa" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shifeng Li <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Shiraz Saleem <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit dc8289f ] When smb1 mount fails, KASAN detect slab-out-of-bounds in init_smb2_rsp_hdr like the following one. For smb1 negotiate(56bytes) , init_smb2_rsp_hdr() for smb2 is called. The issue occurs while handling smb1 negotiate as smb2 server operations. Add smb server operations for smb1 (get_cmd_val, init_rsp_hdr, allocate_rsp_buf, check_user_session) to handle smb1 negotiate so that smb2 server operation does not handle it. [ 411.400423] CIFS: VFS: Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers [ 411.400452] CIFS: Attempting to mount \\192.168.45.139\homes [ 411.479312] ksmbd: init_smb2_rsp_hdr : 492 [ 411.479323] ================================================================== [ 411.479327] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in init_smb2_rsp_hdr+0x1e2/0x1f4 [ksmbd] [ 411.479369] Read of size 16 at addr ffff888488ed0734 by task kworker/14:1/199 [ 411.479379] CPU: 14 PID: 199 Comm: kworker/14:1 Tainted: G OE 6.1.21 #3 [ 411.479386] Hardware name: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Z10PA-D8 Series/Z10PA-D8 Series, BIOS 3801 08/23/2019 [ 411.479390] Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd] [ 411.479425] Call Trace: [ 411.479428] <TASK> [ 411.479432] dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 [ 411.479444] print_report+0x171/0x4a8 [ 411.479452] ? kasan_complete_mode_report_info+0x3c/0x200 [ 411.479463] ? init_smb2_rsp_hdr+0x1e2/0x1f4 [ksmbd] [ 411.479497] kasan_report+0xb4/0x130 [ 411.479503] ? init_smb2_rsp_hdr+0x1e2/0x1f4 [ksmbd] [ 411.479537] kasan_check_range+0x149/0x1e0 [ 411.479543] memcpy+0x24/0x70 [ 411.479550] init_smb2_rsp_hdr+0x1e2/0x1f4 [ksmbd] [ 411.479585] handle_ksmbd_work+0x109/0x760 [ksmbd] [ 411.479616] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x50/0x50 [ 411.479624] ? smb3_encrypt_resp+0x340/0x340 [ksmbd] [ 411.479656] process_one_work+0x49c/0x790 [ 411.479667] worker_thread+0x2b1/0x6e0 [ 411.479674] ? process_one_work+0x790/0x790 [ 411.479680] kthread+0x177/0x1b0 [ 411.479686] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x30/0x30 [ 411.479692] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 411.479702] </TASK> Fixes: 39b291b ("ksmbd: return unsupported error on smb1 mount") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
mcarlin-ds
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2024
[ Upstream commit 807252f ] Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning. This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write() in between: -> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir() -> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create() -> kern_path_create() -> filename_create() -> mnt_want_write() -> mnt_want_write() Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs helpers that call kern_path_create(). Full lockdep trace below: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.6.0-rc5 torvalds#775 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410 but task is already holding lock: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_writers#5); lock(sb_writers#5); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32: #0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980 #2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260 #3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260 Cc: [email protected] Fixes: 40b268d ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions") Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was reporting shunt voltage in mV, not uV.