Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added sbnd recomb and diffusion fcls #366
added sbnd recomb and diffusion fcls #366
Changes from all commits
132e1b1
5724821
3d6015f
52c6571
34b0b5a
8596922
cd3c852
d5cd990
a494d5b
5ca1acd
a5c0ace
fa371dd
d6434b2
415b402
77fe2f8
954dfa0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! Sorry I saw this PR was merged already, but I just noticed that this PR changes the standard g4 fcl. Is this intentional? This way, it's keeping all data products, with many copies of SimEnergyDeposits. @fjnicolas @lynnt-uchicago @henrylay97
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi! yes, the reason is that
g4_drops.fcl
was created for thelite
version. it was decided that sim energy deposits would be dropped as part of thelite
workflow but should be available by default since a few people have needed those sim energy deposits recentlyThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for clarifying @ibsafa! LArG4 makes three copies of SimEnergyDeposits, two of them can be dropped without loss (but people can correct me!). The reason why all three were dropped was a mistake, and was fixed by @fjnicolas with PR #368. My suggestion would be to keep that block above in the standard fcl, and add more drops commands in the
g4_drops.fcl
for production purposes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marcodeltutto thanks for the suggestion! A conservative solution was finally adopted prioritizing having a working tag for the workshop production. I also agree we are probably keeping "to much" with the current solution and we will revisit it after the workshop. In any case, we think a major refactoring of the fhicls is really needed at this point. I'm opening a issue to keep track of it! #374
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good @fjnicolas, thanks! I agree a refactoring is really needed