This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 3, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Google Seeds #299
Merged
Merged
Google Seeds #299
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -123,6 +123,41 @@ ansible-tower: | |
:condition: | ||
:when: endpoint.verify_ssl | ||
:is: true | ||
google: | ||
:product_name: Google Cloud | ||
:vendor: Google | ||
:icon_url: "/apps/frontend-assets/partners-icons/google-cloud.svg" | ||
:schema: | ||
:authentication: | ||
- :type: project_id_service_account_json | ||
:name: Project ID and Service Account JSON | ||
:fields: | ||
- :component: text-field | ||
:name: authentication.authtype | ||
:hideField: true | ||
:initializeOnMount: true | ||
:initialValue: project_id_service_account_json | ||
- :component: text-field | ||
:name: authentication.username | ||
:label: Project ID | ||
- :component: textarea | ||
:name: authentication.password | ||
:label: Service Account JSON | ||
- :component: text-field | ||
:name: application.extra.dataset | ||
:stepKey: cost-management | ||
:label: Dataset name | ||
:isRequired: true | ||
:validate: | ||
- :type: required | ||
:endpoint: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would we be able to leverage the new Something like this
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, I agree! 👍 We will do it anyway in the future and doing it now will prevent any painful migration. (You should also provide a validate in that object:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. added |
||
:hidden: true | ||
:fields: | ||
- :component: text-field | ||
:name: endpoint.role | ||
:hideField: true | ||
:initializeOnMount: true | ||
:initialValue: google | ||
azure: | ||
:product_name: Microsoft Azure | ||
:vendor: Azure | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the Service Account JSON going to be used to seed the service account email for the wizard?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know, but in the credentials provided by QE there is a
client_email
key-value in the JSONThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyway, I started from the ManageIQ's create form: https://files.gitter.im/5aa15e4ad73408ce4f907617/dsFs/Screenshot-2021-01-15-at-10.44.16.png
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there other use cases for GCP that you are working on besides Cost Management?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is and oportunity for topological-inventory collector, but we don't have any milestone for that as far as i know