Calibrate CJC at next boot

[discip]

After reading this #1387 post, I had the idea to make CJC (Cold Junction Compensation) calibration as accurate as possible by executing it at boot.

This is an attempt to implement that to resolve #1387.

Tested this on both TS80P & Pinecil.

What has changed:

1. Calibrate temperature is now called Calibrate CJC at next boot.
   1. It is now performed, as the name implies, exclusively at the next boot.
   2. The calibration will only start if the tip is installed & the temp difference between tip & handle is < 10°C !
   3. This setting gets deactivated every time it is executed. (No accidental calibration!)
2. Debug Menu was partially rearranged and the entries were aligned, some of which were renamed to unify the appearance.
   1. There is now one more entry named Tip O, which indicates the actual CJC offset.
   2. CHan now Han C, is displayed directly in °C to match Tip C & Max C.
3. All (at least I hope so 😅) the corresponding documentations have been updated.

[discip]

@Ralim
Adding spaces:
discip@9c15795

Makes the TS80P build fail:
https://github.com/discip/IronOS/runs/8166069844?check_suite_focus=true

Do you have any clue on why only the TS80P is affected?

[Ralim]

Out of space, those extra bytes pushed you over the space left in flash

[discip]

btw: Do you have any idea what could help us to reclaim some space again?

[discip]

@Ralim
This can be merged now. 😊

[Ralim]

btw: Do you have any idea what could help us to reclaim some space again?

Most likely future features will be masked off from the Miniware Irons (TS100/TS80/TS80P) at this point
There are things I would like to do, but they are small changes, there isnt much that would free up a significant chunk.

I want to look into compressing all languages (rather than just multi-lang packs) but not sure if that net gains any space or not.

[Ralim]

This looks good to me.
I'll hold off merging until I get a sec to test

[discip]

I am good with that! 😃

[discip]

@Ralim
I had to update the Debug Menu once more to give the alignment a chance.
Text is aligned left and numbers so that the integers are on par.

Hope you don't mind.

[discip]

@Ralim
Just a reminder:
Please don't forget to check if this also works for the TS100 & the Pinecil v2 before merging.

Thank you

[discip]

1. To save space I thought about removing unused features and found that I had never even tried the locking mode!
   Do you know if this is a crucial feature or if someone would miss it if it was removed?

   In one of my branches of my fork I did exactly that and I got ~80 KB back.

2. And by removing the invert screen option in addition to the previous one, we save another ~30 KB.

So creating a PR would not be an issue. 😊

3. I want to look into compressing all languages (rather than just multi-lang packs) but not sure if that net gains any space or not.

   1. Is there anything I could help you with on that?
   2. Or do you think that involves to much in-depth coding?
   3. Maybe you could point me into the right direction?

[Ralim]

I do not want to remove locking mode as it is not a large amount of space, not sure about the 80KB figure?
It is also a reasonably new contribution hmm

Liekwise invert screen is liked by some so prefer not to take out the option, but might need to figure out about reducing its size cost?

[Ralim]

For the language option, I would need to figure out how the current system really works (I didnt write it)
IT may be as simple as removing the non-compressed path in the makefile but reallllllllly not sure off the top of my head

[discip]

1. I do not want to remove locking mode ...

   I'm fine with that. Just wanted to throw in my 2 cents. 😅

   ... not sure about the 80KB figure

   Sorry, my bad! I used the size of the whole zip file as reference! 🤦‍♂️
   So, for eg: TS80P_EN.dfu it saves about 511 bytes or 687 bytes respectively.

2. ... IT may be as simple as removing the non-compressed path in the makefile ...

   Ok, then I guess I just have to wait until you have time, because that alone is beyond my understanding! 🤣

3. Have you had a chance to look into the changes so far?

[Ralim]

Tested on TS100 and works perfectly, so I think its good to gooooooo

[discip]

@Ralim
I guess the 'bug-tag' can now be removed from #1387 (comment).