-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for PrimitivesV2 #2078
Comments
I implemented EstimatorV2Converter Qiskit/qiskit#11899. It may be useful for EstimatorV2. |
In qiskit-ibm-runtime 0.22, there will be a "local testing mode". So if we add SamplerV2 here in Aer, it seems there will be two ways to do the same thing:
In general, should we recommend one over the other? I'm thinking from a documentation perspective. |
Ah, one difference I noticed is that EstimatorV2 might support |
I primarily use Aer as a way to test code for circuit design before deploying to QPUs. Since the recent changes in |
You might want to look at the guide to using |
@garrison Thanks for flagging this. I was able to successfully run that migration guide. However, the circuit metadata is still absent from the result object, in the same way that I reported for fake backends. Due to this inconsistency with results from real QPUs, I'm no longer able to mock QPU runs with |
EstimatorV2 here #2088 |
The primitives in
qiskit_aer/primitives
implementqiskit_aer.primitives.sampler.Sampler
andqiskit_aer.primitives.estimator.Estimator
that are subclassingqiskit.primitives.base.base_sampler.BaseSamplerV1
andqiskit.primitives.base.base_estimator.BaseEstimatorV1
. With the introduction of BaseSamplerV2 and BaseEstimatorV2, it would be great to haveqiskit_aer.primitives.sampler.SamplerV2
and andqiskit_aer.primitives.estimator.EstimatorV2
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: