Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable ruff for jupyter notebooks #147

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023
Merged

Enable ruff for jupyter notebooks #147

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023

Conversation

garrison
Copy link
Member

@garrison garrison commented May 8, 2023

This was inspired by #146. There are still a number of errors to fix in the notebooks. I think we should hold off on this until we migrate all the new notebooks over.

I bumped the nbqa version to 1.6.0 because that is the first version that was advertised to support ruff.

@garrison garrison added the on hold Let's wait for something before merging label May 8, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 8, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5159299157

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.63%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 5159285202: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2325
Relevant Lines: 2594

💛 - Coveralls

@garrison garrison added the code quality Related to style, linters, etc. label May 8, 2023
@garrison garrison added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Jun 1, 2023
@garrison garrison removed the on hold Let's wait for something before merging label Jun 2, 2023
@garrison garrison self-assigned this Jun 2, 2023
@garrison garrison marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2023 20:08
@garrison garrison requested a review from caleb-johnson June 2, 2023 20:08
@caleb-johnson
Copy link
Collaborator

There are still a number of errors to fix in the notebooks.

This looks great, thanks. Are the errors you're talking about just the places where you have # noqa ?

@garrison
Copy link
Member Author

garrison commented Jun 6, 2023

Are the errors you're talking about just the places where you have # noqa ?

That statement is outdated now; yes, all the errors are fixed either by noqa or changes in this PR.

@garrison garrison merged commit 1957a74 into main Jun 6, 2023
@garrison garrison deleted the nbqa-ruff branch June 6, 2023 00:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code quality Related to style, linters, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants