-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Have ErrorProneRuntimeClasspath
ignore non-public types
#972
Conversation
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
4405ef0
to
60e6028
Compare
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
1 similar comment
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
60e6028
to
82b9024
Compare
Okay, the Pitest analysis now fails. Seems to be due to
|
I filed pitest/pitest-junit5-plugin#105. Let's see whether there's a fast response; I can open a PR to revert most of #973 tomorrow. |
82b9024
to
ce44245
Compare
I rebased the branch on top of #976; the build should now pass 👀 |
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
ce44245
to
3d0cfd5
Compare
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
3d0cfd5
to
5994a5e
Compare
Quality Gate passedKudos, no new issues were introduced! 0 New issues |
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice improvement! 🚀
ImmutableMap.of( | ||
"GUAVA_PUBLIC", | ||
ImmutableList.class.getCanonicalName(), | ||
"GUAVA_PRIVATE", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Depends on how you look at it, but strictly speaking this type is not private
, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, it's package-private, but here I meant private-to-the-library/implementation.
❗ This PR is on top of #976. ❗Suggested commit message: