Fixed membership request being added in the user's DB #2582
Conversation
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts (1)
107-108: Remove Unnecessary Commented-Out CodeThe commented-out
console.logstatement is unnecessary and can clutter the codebase. Removing such code enhances readability and maintains a clean code environment.Apply this diff to remove the commented-out line:
- // console.log("Membership request already exists:", membershipRequestExists);
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2582 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.74% 97.74%
========================================
Files 358 358
Lines 18101 18114 +13
Branches 2600 2600
========================================
+ Hits 17693 17706 +13
Misses 404 404
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Please get the code coverage of the patch higher so that it passes the tests.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/checkUserNull.spec.ts (3)
20-42: LGTM: Comprehensive setup and teardown.The setup and teardown hooks are well-structured and follow best practices. Creating test data in
beforeAllensures it's available for all tests, and the cleanup inafterAllis crucial for test isolation.Consider adding error handling in the
beforeAllhook to ensure the test environment is properly set up before running tests. For example:beforeAll(async () => { try { MONGOOSE_INSTANCE = await connect(); // ... rest of the setup ... } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to set up test environment:', error); throw error; } });
44-88: LGTM: Well-structured test case with thorough error checking.The test case effectively covers the scenario where a user is not found when sending a membership request. The mocking of
User.findByIdand the comprehensive error checking are commendable.Consider the following improvements:
- Use
expect.assertions(n)at the beginning of the test to ensure all assertions are called.- Consider using a custom matcher for checking error properties to reduce repetition.
- The error message check could be more specific to ensure the exact error is thrown.
Here's an example of how you could implement these suggestions:
it(`throws NotFoundError if no user exists with _id === context.userId when sending membership request`, async () => { expect.assertions(4); // Ensure all assertions are called const args: MutationSendMembershipRequestArgs = { organizationId: testOrganization?.id, }; const context = { userId: new Types.ObjectId().toString(), }; vi.spyOn(User, "findById").mockResolvedValueOnce(null); await expect(sendMembershipRequestResolver?.({}, args, context)) .rejects.toThrow("User not found"); await expect(sendMembershipRequestResolver?.({}, args, context)) .rejects.toMatchObject({ message: expect.stringMatching(/user not found|user.notFound/i), code: expect.any(String), param: expect.any(String), extensions: expect.objectContaining({ code: expect.any(String), param: expect.any(String), }), }); });This approach simplifies the test, makes it more robust, and easier to maintain.
1-88: Overall, excellent test file with room for minor enhancements.This test file is well-structured and effectively tests an important edge case of the
sendMembershipRequestresolver. It follows best practices for unit testing, including proper setup and teardown, mocking of external dependencies, and thorough error checking.To further improve the test suite:
- Consider adding more test cases to cover other scenarios, such as successful membership requests or different types of errors.
- Implement parameterized tests if there are multiple similar scenarios to test.
- Add comments explaining the purpose of complex setup steps or assertions to improve readability.
Example of a parameterized test:
import { describe, it } from 'vitest'; describe.each([ { userId: null, expectedError: 'User not found' }, { userId: 'invalid-id', expectedError: 'Invalid user ID' }, // Add more scenarios as needed ])('sendMembershipRequest with different user scenarios', ({ userId, expectedError }) => { it(`throws error "${expectedError}" for userId: ${userId}`, async () => { // Test implementation }); });These enhancements would make the test suite more comprehensive and easier to maintain as the codebase evolves.
src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts (1)
107-120: Approved: Improved consistency in membership request handlingThis addition ensures that the user's document is consistent with the existing membership requests. It's a good practice to maintain data integrity across related documents.
However, consider a minor optimization:
Instead of fetching the entire user document earlier and then updating it here, you could combine these operations into a single atomic update:
const updatedUser = await User.findOneAndUpdate( { _id: context.userId, membershipRequests: { $ne: membershipRequestExists._id } }, { $addToSet: { membershipRequests: membershipRequestExists._id } }, { new: true, runValidators: true } ); if (!updatedUser) { // Handle the case where the user wasn't found or the request was already present }This approach would be more efficient and eliminate the need for the separate check and update operations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/resolvers/Mutation/checkUserNull.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:156-170 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:54:09.642Z Learning: In the `sendMembershipRequest` mutation within `src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts`, the team prefers not to introduce transactions for simple operations when existing error handling is sufficient, to avoid unnecessary overhead.Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:81-87 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:51:49.144Z Learning: Including a null check after `User.findById()` is necessary to ensure the `user` is not `null` before accessing its properties, even if `User.exists()` was used earlier.src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts (3)
Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:110-123 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:43:54.188Z Learning: In our codebase, `MembershipRequest.exists()` returns a document with an `_id` field, so accessing `membershipRequestExists._id` is valid.Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:156-170 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:54:09.642Z Learning: In the `sendMembershipRequest` mutation within `src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts`, the team prefers not to introduce transactions for simple operations when existing error handling is sufficient, to avoid unnecessary overhead.Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:81-87 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:51:49.144Z Learning: Including a null check after `User.findById()` is necessary to ensure the `user` is not `null` before accessing its properties, even if `User.exists()` was used earlier.tests/resolvers/Mutation/checkUserNull.spec.ts (1)
Learnt from: syedali237 PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#2582 File: src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts:81-87 Timestamp: 2024-10-12T09:51:49.144Z Learning: Including a null check after `User.findById()` is necessary to ensure the `user` is not `null` before accessing its properties, even if `User.exists()` was used earlier.
🔇 Additional comments (12)
tests/resolvers/Mutation/checkUserNull.spec.ts (1)
1-19: LGTM: Imports and declarations are well-structured.The imports cover all necessary modules, types, and helper functions. The use of
nanoidfor generating unique names is a good practice. Test variables are correctly typed, which will help catch potential issues early.eslint.config.mjs (8)
16-17: Approve addition of recommendedConfig to FlatCompat.The addition of
recommendedConfig: js.configs.recommendedto the FlatCompat instantiation is a good improvement. It ensures that the recommended ESLint configurations are included, which helps maintain consistent code quality standards across the project.
20-37: Approve restructuring of ESLint configuration.The restructuring of the ESLint configuration into an array of objects is an excellent improvement. This change enhances readability and maintainability without altering the functionality. It makes it easier to manage different aspects of the configuration separately, which is particularly beneficial for large projects.
51-66: Approve formatting improvements in the rules section.The reformatting of the rules section enhances readability and consistency. The improved indentation and structure make it easier to understand and maintain the ESLint rules. This change is purely cosmetic and doesn't alter the functionality of the rules, which is a positive improvement.
69-130: Approve improvements to TypeScript-specific configuration.The restructuring and reformatting of the TypeScript-specific configuration is a significant improvement. It enhances readability and makes the configuration easier to maintain. The naming conventions are now more clearly defined, which will help enforce consistent coding standards across the project. This change is beneficial for long-term maintainability of the codebase.
133-147: Approve updates to GraphQL-specific configuration.The changes to the GraphQL-specific configuration are well-implemented. The use of the namespace import for the parser (
graphqlEslint.parser) is consistent with the earlier import statement modification. The overall structure is now more aligned with the rest of the configuration, which improves consistency and readability.
148-163: Approve formatting improvements to file-specific rules.The reformatting of file-specific rules enhances the overall consistency and readability of the configuration. These changes maintain the existing functionality while making the configuration easier to read and maintain. This is a positive improvement that aligns with the overall restructuring of the ESLint configuration file.
Line range hint
1-163: Overall assessment: Significant improvement in configuration structure and readability.The changes made to
eslint.config.mjsrepresent a substantial improvement in the structure and readability of the ESLint configuration. Key points:
- The use of namespace imports for plugins enhances flexibility.
- The restructuring of the configuration into a more modular format improves maintainability.
- Consistent formatting throughout the file makes it easier to read and understand.
- No functional changes were introduced, preserving the existing behavior while improving the code quality.
These changes will make it easier for developers to understand, maintain, and extend the ESLint configuration in the future. Great work on improving the developer experience without introducing risk.
11-11: Approve import statement change and verify usage.The change from default import to namespace import for
@graphql-eslint/eslint-pluginis good. It provides more flexibility in accessing the plugin's exports.Please verify that all usages of this plugin in the configuration have been updated accordingly. Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the old import style:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No remaining usage of the old import style found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of the old import style for @graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin rg --type javascript 'import \w+ from "@graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin"'Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of the old import style for @graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin rg --type js 'import \w+ from "@graphql-eslint/eslint-plugin"'Length of output: 64
src/resolvers/Mutation/sendMembershipRequest.ts (2)
81-87: Approved: Additional user validation enhances robustnessThis additional null check for the user after retrieval is a good practice. It ensures that the user object is not null before accessing its properties, preventing potential runtime errors. Although there's an earlier
User.exists()check, this extra validation adds an important layer of safety, especially considering potential race conditions or inconsistencies in distributed systems.
128-134: Approved: Clear creation of MembershipRequestThe creation of the MembershipRequest document is implemented correctly. The updated comment accurately describes the operation, improving code readability.
package.json (1)
141-141: New devDependency added: "globals"The
globalspackage has been added as a development dependency with version^15.11.0. This package is typically used to provide a list of global identifiers for various JavaScript environments, which can be useful for linting and static analysis tools.While this addition doesn't directly address the PR objectives related to fixing membership request issues, it may be part of an effort to improve code quality and development tooling. However, there are a few points to consider:
The purpose of adding this package is not clear from the PR objectives or the AI-generated summary. It would be helpful to understand the motivation behind this addition.
The
globalspackage is often used in conjunction with ESLint. Given that this project already uses ESLint (as evidenced by the existing ESLint-related dependencies), we should ensure that this addition is intentional and necessary.The version
^15.11.0allows for compatible updates. This is generally fine, but it's worth noting that major version changes (if any) might introduce breaking changes in the future.To ensure this addition doesn't conflict with existing setups and is properly integrated, please run the following checks:
If you need any help integrating this new package with the existing ESLint setup or have any questions about its usage, please let me know.
✅ Verification successful
Addition of "globals" Verified
The
globalspackage has been successfully added todevDependenciesinpackage.jsonwith version^15.11.0. Additionally, it's being imported ineslint.config.mjs, indicating its use in the ESLint configuration for defining global variables.No conflicts or issues were found with existing dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if globals is already a dependency of any existing devDependencies npm ls globals # Verify if there are any ESLint configuration files that might need updating find . -name ".eslintrc*" # Check for any scripts that might be using the globals package grep -R "require('globals')" . grep -R "from 'globals'" .Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use jq to check if "globals" is listed under devDependencies in package.json jq '.devDependencies.globals' package.json # Verify the exact location of "globals" within devDependencies jq 'paths | select(inpath(["devDependencies"]) and .[-1] == "globals")' package.json # Search for any usage of "globals" in scripts or configurations without require/import grep -R '"globals"' .Length of output: 719
|
@palisadoes Patch coverage increased to 100% with the last commit. 
|
|
Please fix linting, formatting, and type errors |
|
It should automatically do for next commits. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
@pranshugupta54 On running npm run lint:fix, formatting errors are appearing repo-wide, not just in my changes, should we address this separately? |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Check the details of failed action - here, you only need to fix these |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.eslintrc.json (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Consider the impact of strict linting rules on developer productivityWhile the ESLint configuration in this file promotes excellent coding practices and type safety, it's worth noting that some rules (including the newly added one) are quite strict. This can lead to improved code quality but might also impact developer productivity, especially for those new to the project.
Consider:
- Documenting these linting rules in the project's contributing guidelines.
- Providing examples of how to satisfy these rules in the documentation.
- Regularly reviewing and adjusting these rules based on team feedback and project needs.
This will help maintain a balance between code quality and developer experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- schema.graphql (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- schema.graphql
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.eslintrc.json (1)
113-113: Excellent addition of the "@typescript-eslint/ban-types" rule!This rule enhances type safety by prohibiting the use of problematic types such as
{},object,Function,String,Boolean, andNumber. It encourages developers to use more specific and appropriate types, leading to improved code quality, better readability, and reduced chances of runtime errors.The addition of this rule aligns well with the existing strict TypeScript configuration in this file.
|
@pranshugupta54 , this PR got a bit messed up. Should I close this one and raise a new one? |
|
@pranshugupta54 would you be able to review this? |
|
Let's wait for CodeRabbit to process the PR then I'll have a look |
|
@pranshugupta54 Could you please help by re-triggering the stale review? It appears to be stuck in the review process. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
I'm glad to see this is fixed, but we need the tests |
|
@palisadoes Okay, I will look into it. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
BugFix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2242 (Case 1)
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
1728724319114819.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
N/A
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Working on the remaining two cases but ran into some challenges. This will require multiple PRs.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit