-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle creatorId #2564
Handle creatorId #2564
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the GraphQL schema and input types, specifically enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2564 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.58% 98.58%
========================================
Files 356 356
Lines 18061 18061
Branches 2411 2411
========================================
Hits 17806 17806
Misses 252 252
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Please fix the failing tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
schema.graphql (1)
1028-1031
: Consider the wider impact of these changes.While the additions to
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
are beneficial, please consider the following:
- Resolver Implementation: Ensure that the backend resolvers for membership requests are updated to handle these new filtering options.
- Query Complexity: Be aware that these additional filtering options might increase the complexity of some queries. Consider the performance impact for large datasets and optimize if necessary.
- Client-side Impact: Any client-side code that constructs queries using
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
may need to be updated to take advantage of these new filtering options.- Testing: Add new test cases to cover these filtering scenarios, ensuring proper functionality and performance.
To verify the impact and usage of these new fields, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage and implementation of new MembershipRequestsWhereInput fields # Test: Search for resolver implementations handling the new fields echo "Checking resolver implementations:" rg --type typescript "creatorId|creatorId_in|creatorId_not|creatorId_not_in" -g "*resolver.ts" # Test: Search for client-side query constructions using MembershipRequestsWhereInput echo "Checking client-side query constructions:" rg --type typescript "MembershipRequestsWhereInput.*creatorId" -g "*.ts" # Test: Search for test files that might need updating echo "Checking test files:" rg --type typescript "MembershipRequestsWhereInput" -g "*test.ts"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- schema.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/typeDefs/inputs.ts (1)
287-291
: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.The additions to
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
are well-implemented and consistent with the existing structure. These new fields (creatorId
,creatorId_not
,creatorId_in
,creatorId_not_in
) enable more granular filtering of membership requests based on the creator's ID, which directly addresses the PR objective of handling creatorId for editing SuperAdmin profiles.The changes maintain the file's consistency by:
- Using the correct type (
ID
) for the new fields.- Following the existing naming convention.
- Preserving alphabetical order, as per the file's comment.
schema.graphql (2)
1028-1031
: LGTM! Enhanced filtering capabilities for membership requests.The additions to the
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
input type provide more granular control over filtering membership requests based on the creator's ID. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of handling the creatorId for editing SuperAdmin profiles.These new fields allow for the following operations:
- Filter by a specific creator (
creatorId: ID
)- Filter by multiple creators (
creatorId_in: [ID!]
)- Exclude a specific creator (
creatorId_not: ID
)- Exclude multiple creators (
creatorId_not_in: [ID!]
)This enhancement will improve the flexibility of queries related to membership requests, particularly in the context of SuperAdmin profile management.
1028-1031
: Summary: Approved changes with considerations for implementation and testing.The additions to
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
are well-designed and align with the PR objectives. They provide enhanced filtering capabilities for membership requests, which will be particularly useful for handling creatorId in the context of editing SuperAdmin profiles.Key points:
- The changes are approved and beneficial.
- Consider updating backend resolvers, client-side query construction, and test cases.
- Be aware of potential performance implications for complex queries on large datasets.
Overall, these changes improve the flexibility of the API without introducing breaking changes. Ensure thorough testing and updates to related components for a smooth integration.
src/types/generatedGraphQLTypes.ts (1)
1114-1117
: LGTM! Enhanced filtering capabilities for membership requests.The additions to the
MembershipRequestsWhereInput
type provide more granular filtering options for membership requests based on the creator's ID. This enhancement allows for more flexible and precise querying, which can be particularly useful in scenarios where you need to filter requests by specific creators or groups of creators.The new fields follow a consistent naming pattern and include options for equality, inclusion, and negation:
creatorId
: Exact matchcreatorId_in
: Match any of the provided IDscreatorId_not
: Exclude a specific IDcreatorId_not_in
: Exclude any of the provided IDsThese additions align well with GraphQL best practices for input types and will improve the API's usability.
@palisadoes fixed the tests. Can you please review it |
755c14a
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2555
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
After handling the creator id correctly that is sent from admin from the admin
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary by CodeRabbit