-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gdal: disable flaky tests; fix darwin #354783
Conversation
3e87f08
to
59f2470
Compare
|
# failing for unknown reason | ||
# https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10806#issuecomment-2362054085 | ||
"test_ogr_gmlas_billion_laugh" | ||
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be an opportunity to disable a few flaky tests that were collected in #327323.
] | |
# Flaky on hydra, collected in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/327323. | |
"test_ogr_gmlas_huge_processing_time" | |
"test_ogr_gpkg_background_rtree_build" | |
"test_vsiaz_fake_write" | |
"test_vsioss_6" | |
] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at how they mark them upstream, wondering if we could set env.CI=true
or something to make sure we skip anything they flag as flaky to lower maintenance burden.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably a good idea, but we should check if our list contains anything that is not marked as flaky upstream. We could also ask if they'd consider disabling these tests by default instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Setting CI
variable is a good idea even though it currently disables only few tests
@khaneliman , thank you very much for your PR. It looks good to me, but I'm not sure if we can bump GDAL version at this stage of release. |
Result of 6 packages marked as broken and skipped:
32 packages failed to build:
133 packages built:
|
If you're worried about bumping the version, I could pull that part out and just disable the failing tests for this release. I didn't think the minor version bump would be blocking, though. (But, I'm not familiar with their versioning semantics) |
|
Split off the version bump to a separate PR if we don't want to merge the bump. So we can just disable tests causing issues before release if maintainers don't feel comfortable bumping the package now. |
Bad bot |
Can you relaunch nixpkgs-review? I wouldn't be surprised if most packages are passing now. |
Were fixed in previous versions.
Disabling a few tests that have been reported by various users and upstream to be inconsistent to avoid transient failures and triggering rebuilds.
|
Any objections to merging this? |
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
Things done
ZHF: #352882
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/277361377/nixlog/1
Closes #327323
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.