Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEA] Allow RangePartitioning to work with structs #1607

Closed
kuhushukla opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

[FEA] Allow RangePartitioning to work with structs #1607

kuhushukla opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing

Comments

@kuhushukla
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Once #1605 is in, we should allow nested types as input and output types to the RangePartitioner.
@kuhushukla kuhushukla added feature request New feature or request ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify labels Jan 27, 2021
@kuhushukla kuhushukla mentioned this issue Jan 27, 2021
Closed
5 tasks
@sameerz sameerz removed the ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify label Feb 2, 2021
@gerashegalov
Copy link
Collaborator

this issue depends on upper/lower_bound implementation for structs in cuDF rapidsai/cudf#7690

@sameerz sameerz changed the title [FEA] Allow RangePartitioning to work with nested types [FEA] Allow RangePartitioning to work with structs May 11, 2021
@sameerz
Copy link
Collaborator

sameerz commented May 11, 2021

Modifying this issue to focus on structs, rather than structs and lists.

@sameerz sameerz closed this as completed May 11, 2021
@sameerz sameerz added task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing and removed feature request New feature or request labels May 12, 2021
gerashegalov added a commit to gerashegalov/spark-rapids that referenced this issue May 26, 2021
@gerashegalov
Improve test coverage for sorting structs
ab5a494 
Relates to NVIDIA#1607

Signed-off-by: Gera Shegalov <[email protected]>
@gerashegalov gerashegalov mentioned this issue May 26, 2021
Merged
abellina pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 27, 2021
@gerashegalov
Improve test coverage for sorting structs (#2507)
1cd417e 
* Improve test coverage for sorting structs

Relates to #1607

Signed-off-by: Gera Shegalov <[email protected]>

* cudf fix
abellina pushed a commit to abellina/spark-rapids that referenced this issue May 27, 2021
@gerashegalov @abellina
Improve test coverage for sorting structs
6d90877 
Relates to NVIDIA#1607

Signed-off-by: Gera Shegalov <[email protected]>
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@gerashegalov
Improve test coverage for sorting structs (NVIDIA#2507)
4f6c624 
* Improve test coverage for sorting structs

Relates to NVIDIA#1607

Signed-off-by: Gera Shegalov <[email protected]>

* cudf fix
nartal1 pushed a commit to nartal1/spark-rapids that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2021
@gerashegalov
Improve test coverage for sorting structs (NVIDIA#2507)
e6ff3e5 
* Improve test coverage for sorting structs

Relates to NVIDIA#1607

Signed-off-by: Gera Shegalov <[email protected]>

* cudf fix
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gerashegalov @sameerz @kuhushukla