Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Lasslop wind effect on fire ROS #455

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 2, 2019

Conversation

jkshuman
Copy link
Contributor

Remove reducing effect of high winds based on Lasslop et al 2014

Description:

Within SFMain remove the conditional clause that reduces fire rate of spread for high wind speeds. Within parameter files removed the parameter for fire_wind_max that triggers the conditional.
This showed an improvement in mode simulated fire behavior in past work (Lasslop et al 2014), but current research demonstrates there is not a clear link between high winds and a reducing effect on rate of spread. Andela et al 2018 ESSDD https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2018-89
This PR acts to remove this Lasslop et al (2014) reducing effect, and revert back to original Thonicke ROS wind effect.

Collaborators:

JKShuman, RKnox

Expectation of Answer Changes:

Fire behavior rate of spread will be higher at high winds within simulation, dependent on previous fire_wind_max parameter and forcing data.

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • [x ] I have updated the in-code documentation .AND. (the technical note .OR. the wiki) accordingly.
  • [ x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • FATES PASS/FAIL regression tests were run
  • If answers were expected to change, evaluation was performed and provided

Test Results:

Code compiles and runs on Hobart.

jkshuman and others added 4 commits December 20, 2018 15:11
Remove the reducing effect of high wind speeds on fire behavior.
Also remove the fire_wind_max that triggers this reducing effect.
New reserach shows that there is not a reducing link between
wind speed and fire behavior, specifically rate of spread.
Andela et al 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2018-89

User interface changes?: Yes, remove fire_wind_max parameter

Code review: JKShuman

Test suite: Cheyenne
Test baseline:
Test namelist changes: none
Test answer changes: expect changes, dependant on wind conditions
Test summary: tested for compile on Cheyenne
Code review: JKShuman

Test suite: Hobart
Test summary: 2 year test run
@rgknox rgknox self-requested a review January 1, 2019 22:32
Copy link
Contributor

@rgknox rgknox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jkshuman, thanks for the updates.
I took a look through and don't have any recommendations.
Is there anyone you would like to have look through this before we proceed with testing?

@rosiealice
Copy link
Contributor

rosiealice commented Jan 2, 2019

Looks good to me. Do you think there should be a comment to the effect that this option exists in the literature but we've chosen to not use it for the reasons you describe?

@jkshuman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkshuman commented Jan 2, 2019

Thanks for looking this over. I think the information in the PR as to the removal is enough.

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor

rgknox commented Jan 2, 2019

running tests

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor

rgknox commented Jan 2, 2019

All pass:
/gpfs/fs1/scratch/rgknox/clmed-tests/fates.cheyenne.intel.rem-laslop-C5dc7f0a-F34f580c

@rgknox rgknox merged commit 979cb6b into NGEET:master Jan 2, 2019
@jkshuman jkshuman deleted the remove_Lasslop_wind branch June 5, 2019 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants