DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via Bullseye repo #2997

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T10:28:50Z

Dear Michalng,

I am missing Wireguard on my new DietPi (Pi Zero). How can I install that package? PiHole installation was simple and easy, but now I want to add WireGuard to use my PiHole on the go.

Best wishes.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T20:35:58Z

@johnnyt83
Many thanks for your question.

Actually WireGuard was never available for ARMv6 systems (RPi 1 and Zero). It is installed from the Debian Sid repository and their armhf branch is only ARMv7 compatible. Only complete source build from scratch would be thinkable. but this would need to be redone after every kernel upgrade.

IMO we should wait for a port to Debian Buster (which will then be available on Raspbian Buster as well, short after), before enabling it for ARMv6 RPis.

EDIT: Ah wait, just recognised that the wireguard packages are not listed arch-specific but as arch "all": https://packages.debian.org/sid/wireguard So armhf/ARMv6 specific issues should not occur here. However I remember Fourdee disabling it on ARMv6 after facing issues there. But could be retested, there have been some updates meanwhile.

If you want to test it, I will guide you through the steps, but no guarantee it will work.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T20:40:38Z

I would like to retest, just guide me gently :)

auch auf deutsch, wenn du magst.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T20:42:23Z

I already have a working DietPi setup from this morning and Pi-Hole is running just fine. Now I would like to add WireGuard (for dummies).

(already followed this tutorial (https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/bnihyz/guide_how_to_install_wireguard_on_a_raspberry_pi/) on my other Pi Zero and managed to get it working (VPN at least), but no internet access when connected to WG.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T21:07:27Z

@johnnyt83
I was mistaken, indeed the WireGuard binaries are architecture specific, I was already wondering how it can be different 😄: https://packages.debian.org/sid/wireguard-tools
You guide supports this, as it suggests a source build for ARMv6. If this already works (service start succeeds), then it must be something about the configuration.

Here is the WireGuard server config we use:

cd /etc/wireguard
cat << _EOF_ > wg0.conf
[Interface]
Address = 10.9.0.1/24
PrivateKey = $(<server_private.key)
ListenPort = 51820

PostUp = sysctl net.ipv4.conf.%i.forwarding=1 net.ipv4.conf.\$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network).forwarding=1
PostUp = sysctl net.ipv6.conf.\$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network).accept_ra=2
PostUp = sysctl net.ipv6.conf.%i.forwarding=1 net.ipv6.conf.\$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network).forwarding=1
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o \$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) -j MASQUERADE
PostUp = ip6tables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o \$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o \$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = ip6tables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o \$(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) -j MASQUERADE

# Client 1
[Peer]
PublicKey = $(<client_public.key)
AllowedIPs = 10.9.0.2/32

# Client 2
#[Peer]
#PublicKey = XXXX
#AllowedIPs = 10.9.0.3/32

This includes all IP forwarding rules in the service startup. I also added the keys above, if you created them with the same names as the guide you linked. Otherwise add manually.
It as well includes IPv6, which could be an issue when missing (like in the guide you followed) if the DNS server resolves an IPv6 address. Then access should hang.

The client config look exactly like ours besides, we use netmask /24 on the client as well, not 100% sure currently about the practical difference however: Address = 10.9.0.2/24
And as DNS nameserver it is simplest to use the WireGuard network IP itself, since this for sure will never change, regardless of local network IP: DNS = 10.9.0.1

Do you use a mobile client or another server or desktop?
You could run the wg command on server (and in case client) to check if the connection has indeed successfully established, handshake is done etc.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T21:21:51Z

only "wg" does not return anything on my zero unfortunately.
I copied your server config and added my keys.

just to make sure I did not screw up that last simple bit, here is my client1.conf:

[Interface]
Address = 10.9.0.2/32
DNS = 192.168.1.4 (My Pi Hole which is the same machine)
PrivateKey = XXXX

[Peer]
PublicKey = YYYY
Endpoint = myDDNS:forwardedPort
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0
#PersistentkeepAlive = 60

Update: I use a mobile client and can test local WiFi and external network as well. None works so far.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T21:49:12Z

@johnnyt83

only "wg" does not return anything on my zero unfortunately.

Hmm, at least the server values should always show up when running wg.
You started WireGuard via systemctl start wg-quick@wg0?
Is the wg0 interface up afterwards? ip a

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T21:53:38Z

this is what it gives me:

https://abload.de/img/wiregzujtjh9.png

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T21:57:19Z

@johnnyt83
Okay the interface is not loaded, thus the service was not started or failed. Please run:

sudo systemctl start wg-quick@wg0
journalctl -u wg-quick@wg0

If the second command shows --- no entries --- try this one: journalctl -u wg-quick
I am not 100% sure how to journalctl handles instantiated services 😉.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T21:58:56Z

even the first command did not go through positive:

https://abload.de/img/wiregzuovkw6.png

so the second command gave me this:

https://abload.de/img/wiregzu226ijn9.png

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:01:53Z

@johnnyt83
Could you paste the full line that starts with /usr/bin/wg-quick: eval: line 248: syntax error near....

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:07:19Z

of course:

https://abload.de/img/wiregzu22bsj0j.png

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:09:13Z

Ah found it, it's about the PreUp/PostDown scripts.

You are indeed on an DietPi system, aren't you? Because user+hostname from your screens look like a Raspbian image. DietPi comes without user pi and with hostname DietPi by default. Because the WG server config I pasted requires a DietPi file to be present.

On non DietPi, switch the following in wg0.conf:
All $(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) by eth0 (your main network device).

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:12:13Z

my test pi zero is a raspbian (pi hole prebuilt), yes.
that was what I was playing around with today, because I could not even find it in DietPi and the tutorial was for a simple raspi.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:18:23Z

UPDATE: seems to work when testing local WiFi now (speed is of course less than without Wireguard), but it refuses to work on mobile network connection.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:28:28Z

@johnnyt83
The tutorial will work on DietPi as well because the core system is Raspbian as well 😉.
Great that it works now.

For mobile connection you need to assure that UDP port 51820 is forwarded from your router to the Pi. Ah from your posts above it looks like it is, but assure that it is UDP and not (only) TCP.

Does wg on the server list the client and show a handshake with matching timestamp when you connect and try to access something from the client?

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:29:36Z

"Unable to access interface wg0: Operation not permitted"

Port is forwarded (UPD and TCP) and is the same as in the config file.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:30:15Z

@johnnyt83
I guess you need root permissions to access the WireGuard CLI: sudo wg

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:34:46Z

looks good for local:

https://abload.de/img/wiregzu22jlkcr.png

UPDATE: Even works from my neighbors WiFi. so mobile should work, too. guess my reception here is the problem indoors.

strange thing: my IP cameras are not showing up in the IP camera app (they use my DDNS). Is this a loopback problem?!

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:39:12Z

@johnnyt83
One thing to try on the client config:

Address = 10.9.0.2/24
DNS = 10.9.0.1

So netmask from 32 to 24 and use WireGuard interface IP instead of local network IP for DNS resolving.

And with Pi-hole you have a webserver installed that can be used to test general access from external network (or generally via DDNS):

Forward TCP port 80 to the Pi.
Try to access from mobile, via mobile internet, without VPN connection of course, via browser yourDDNS/admin, which should be the Pi-hole admin page. If this works well, then at least from local network side the VPN requests should arrive as well.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:41:06Z

netmask 24 seems to work fine (dunno what it does though) and DNS is fine, too. Thanks so much. Can I follow the same tutorial on DietPi?

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:46:13Z

@johnnyt83
Ah great, so there was a reason why we use netmask 24. To be true I am also not 100% sure about the practical difference.

Usually netmasks define the IP range of the network, 32 specifies one specific IP, while 24 specifies all IPs from 10.9.0.1 - 10.9.0.255, 16 would be 10.9.0.1 - 10.9.255.255, so again one variable octet more etc.
Of course the client has one specific IP, like the server as well, but it seems usual that those "Address" entries should contain the netmask the defines the whole IP range of the WireGuard network, so the peers identify themselves as part of it, or something like that 😅...

And ah yes you can do exactly the same on DietPi. There you can leave the $(sed -n 3p /DietPi/dietpi/.network) fields inside the wg0.conf. Line 3 of /DietPi/dietpi/.network contains the active network interface (eth0 in your case) which is derived/updated on boot or when changing network settings, so is more flexible 😉.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T22:51:58Z

thanks for the help! whenever I need a secure connection now I can enable this "free" VPN to my home network. astonishingly the pi zero peaks at around 25 mbit/s which is fast enough for my use cases.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T22:55:01Z

@johnnyt83

astonishingly the pi zero peaks at around 25 mbit/s which is fast enough for my use cases.

Jep I guess mobile internet will be the bottle neck in most cases.

Okay I mark this as closed then.

As you proved the source build to work quite well, and as this aside from binaries seem to create systemd unit (service file) and config dirs etc identical to the Debian package, we could actually add this to DietPi-Software as well.
How long did the source build take (running the make command)?

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T23:00:36Z

3 minutes, I guess. would be great to find it in the DietPi software list, soon.

MichaIng · 2019-07-21T23:10:13Z

@johnnyt83
Wow that is faster than I though. Proves that WireGuard holds its promises to be small and efficient code-wise.

So

G_AGUP
G_AGUG
mkdir /etc/wireguard
cd /etc/wireguard
apt install raspberrypi-kernel-headers libelf-dev libmnl-dev build-essential pkg-conf git qrencode iptables
git clone https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard
cd WireGuard/src
make
make install

worked without error?
We would skip Git and instead download the code manually (wget https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/snapshot/WireGuard-master.tar.xz) to tmp dir and remove sources after install.

Ah the steps match official instructions: https://www.wireguard.com/install/

Besides pkg-conf mentioned there as additional tool chain package 🤔.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-21T23:12:07Z

will try your mini-tutorial tomorrow on the DietPi.

MichaIng · 2019-07-24T13:38:47Z

@johnnyt83
Perhaps there has been some interference with a recent firmware update, so that the kernel headers do not match the currently loaded kernel anymore.
Please try the following:

G_AGI raspberrypi-kernel raspberrypi-kernel-headers libmnl-dev libelf-dev build-essential pkg-config
G_AGDUG
reboot
# After reboot, so new kernel 4.19.58 is loaded and matches the headers
cd /etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src
make
make install

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T00:16:02Z

root@DietPi:/etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src# make install
  INSTALL /etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src/wireguard.ko
  DEPMOD  4.19.57+
Warning: modules_install: missing 'System.map' file. Skipping depmod.
depmod -a

this is what I got in return :(

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T00:16:56Z

and of course all the other things that I wanted to put in "spoiler" tags that I cannot find here:

removed '/usr/bin/wg'
'wg' -> '/usr/bin/wg'
removed '/usr/share/man/man8/wg.8'
'man/wg.8' -> '/usr/share/man/man8/wg.8'
removed '/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/wg'
'completion/wg.bash-completion' -> '/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/wg'
removed '/usr/bin/wg-quick'
'wg-quick/linux.bash' -> '/usr/bin/wg-quick'
removed '/usr/share/man/man8/wg-quick.8'
'man/wg-quick.8' -> '/usr/share/man/man8/wg-quick.8'
removed '/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/wg-quick'
'completion/wg-quick.bash-completion' -> '/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/wg-quick'
removed '/lib/systemd/system/[email protected]'
'systemd/[email protected]' -> '/lib/systemd/system/[email protected]'

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T07:28:56Z

@johnnyt83
You are still on old kernel 4.19.57, or at least WireGuard tries to compile against it.

uname -a shows 4.19.57 or 4.19.58?

Perhaps also some configs have been already created that do not match anymore, so you might need to remove the WireGuard sources and re-download.

Otherwise please reassure that you did the mentioned G_AG* commands and a reboot afterwards.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T07:44:52Z

root@DietPi:~# uname -a
Linux DietPi 4.19.57+ #1244 Thu Jul 4 18:42:50 BST 2019 armv6l GNU/Linux

But I set it up/ran an update just a few days ago. Everything was up to date.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T07:45:27Z

when I start from scratch now with dietPi, is wireguard in the software list now?

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T07:49:25Z

The new update was also a few days ago. It is necessary that active kernel and installed headers match and I bet headers are on 4.19.58.

Nope it's not yet in the install list. If it works I might be able to add it the next days to dev code.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T07:51:26Z

I would really like to fix that, but it seems I am up to date:

https://abload.de/img/dietpijvkfs.png

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T07:55:27Z

Its not about dietpi version but about the kernel version. Please run the commands I mentioned above to update the APT packages which include kernel.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T08:02:21Z

did it again (all the commands above), one by one was executed OK. and I am stuck on
"root@DietPi:/etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src# make install
INSTALL /etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src/wireguard.ko
DEPMOD 4.19.57+
Warning: modules_install: missing 'System.map' file. Skipping depmod.
depmod -a"

really weird.

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T08:10:22Z

can I install a remote tool on my dietPi so you could login for yourself?

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T10:41:54Z

@johnnyt83
Yeah probably easier. I have two other ideas:

Removing and re-downloading the sources to remove some probably created configs that do not match
Creating a symlink from /lib/modules/<version>/build to /lib/modules/<version>/source or the other way round. I recognised that on some systems only one is present while build tools search for kernel sources in the other one. Although error message should be different then.

Yeah if you want to grant remote access, SSH would be easiest, as I am not too familiar with remot3.it or such.
Or do you have a desktop installed? Then VNC would be an alternative that allows you to track what I am doing.
In case of SSH, when opening it to www, assure that root and dietpi users have a strong password and at best do not forward port 22 to 22 but some random port to 22, which is not usual target of brute-force attempts.

Send login credentials to [email protected]

johnnyt83 · 2019-07-25T11:36:34Z

Yes, SSH sounds fine. So I only need to change the password for users root and dietpi and forward a random port to my dietpi, right?

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T12:07:10Z

@johnnyt83
Jep, you can change both passwords (for dietpi and root users together) via dietpi-config > Security Options, which as well allows you to change the default password for (most) new software installs.

MichaIng · 2019-07-25T22:33:34Z

Notes to self

Okay compilation from source works well, following the Debian steps: https://www.wireguard.com/install/
Of course raspberrypi-kernel + raspberrypi-kernel-headers instead of linux-image-*.

Sources should be kept on the machine. Since no DKMS is installed, after kernel updates WireGuard needs to be recompiled:

cd /path/to/WireGuard/src
make
make install

Where to store?
/etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src is not thee classic location for this, on the other hand then everything is in one place.
Else /opt or /usr/local/ or /mnt/dietpi_userdata to have it on external drive easily?

Another idea:

Create /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dietpi-wireguard-compile on install which contains the WireGuard module compile steps: dpkg-reconfigure wireguard-dkms on RPi2/3/4 and cd ..; make; make install on RPi1/Zero
Currently on all most SBCs one needs to manually re-compile the WireGuard module after every kernel upgrade.
But we need to remove this script on DietPi-Software install, if present, since we want to update the WireGuard packages or sources as well and avoid doubled module compilation 😉.

pqhf5kd · 2019-08-09T10:26:48Z

I'm also trying to install WireGuard on a pi2 and while I can follow basic CLI instructions, I'm no expert. Can you just clarify this please:

Notes to self

Okay compilation from source works well, following the Debian steps: https://www.wireguard.com/install/
Of course raspberrypi-kernel + raspberrypi-kernel-headers instead of linux-image-*.

I guess you mean these steps compiling-the-kernel-module-from-source but what are raspberrypi-kernel + raspberrypi-kernel-headers?

MichaIng · 2019-08-10T13:15:53Z

@pqhf5kd
Follow these steps: #2997 (comment)

raspberrypi-kernel raspberrypi-kernel-headers

These are the APT packages for the RPi kernel and it's sources/headers. required to build kernel modules, like WireGuard is one. The official build instructions assume those be named like linux-image-* and linux-headers-* which is true for most systems but not for RPi.

qymab · 2019-09-03T16:44:46Z

@johnnyt83
Perhaps there has been some interference with a recent firmware update, so that the kernel headers do not match the currently loaded kernel anymore.
Please try the following:
G_AGI raspberrypi-kernel raspberrypi-kernel-headers libmnl-dev libelf-dev build-essential pkg-config
G_AGDUG
reboot
# After reboot, so new kernel 4.19.58 is loaded and matches the headers
cd /etc/wireguard/WireGuard/src
make
make install

Using this working great in my RPI 1, thanks.

MichaIng · 2019-09-21T16:34:28Z

@johnnyt83
Great news, the source build for ARMv6 RPis (1+Zero) is not required anymore. WireGuard packages have been added to the Bullseye (new testing) repo, thus are available from Raspbian as well. I switched the source repo to Bullseye on all devices, since this can be considered more stable then Sid, and enabled support for RPi ARMv6 by this: e62ba9f

Another minor enhancement: Now, when kernel packages are upgraded on RPi, the WireGuard kernel module is rebuild automatically as well: 5789594

Changelog: eeb81e0

MichaIng added Question ❔ Raspberry Pi ARMv6 labels Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 closed this as completed Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng added the Feature request 🏭 label Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng added this to the v6.26 milestone Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng changed the title ~~Wireguard missing from DietPi list in new Pi Zero installation?~~ DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via source build Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng reopened this Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng changed the title ~~DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via source build~~ DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via Bullseye repo Sep 21, 2019

MichaIng added the Testing/testers required 🔽 label Sep 21, 2019

MichaIng mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2019

Beta v6.26.0 #3112

Merged

MichaIng mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2019

Open Beta v6.26 | Please help testing and hardening the upcoming release #3131

Closed

MichaIng mentioned this issue Oct 15, 2019

Release v6.26 #3162

Merged

MichaIng removed the Testing/testers required 🔽 label Oct 15, 2019

MichaIng closed this as completed Oct 15, 2019

DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via Bullseye repo #2997

DietPi-Software | WireGuard: Enable for RPi ARMv6 via Bullseye repo #2997

Comments

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 24, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019 • edited by MichaIng Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019 • edited by MichaIng Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019 • edited Loading

Notes to self

pqhf5kd commented Aug 9, 2019 • edited Loading

Notes to self

MichaIng commented Aug 10, 2019

qymab commented Sep 3, 2019

MichaIng commented Sep 21, 2019 • edited Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 24, 2019 •

edited

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019 •

edited by MichaIng

Loading

johnnyt83 commented Jul 25, 2019 •

edited by MichaIng

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Jul 25, 2019 •

edited

Loading

pqhf5kd commented Aug 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading

MichaIng commented Sep 21, 2019 •

edited

Loading